Contract II






Law of Contract-II | LLB 102 | Complete Notes



โ†‘ Top

Law of Contract โ€” II

BA LLB | Paper Code: LLB 102 | Fairfield Institute of Management & Technology
๐Ÿ“˜ Indian Contract Act, 1872
๐Ÿค Indian Partnership Act, 1932
๐Ÿ›’ Sale of Goods Act, 1930
๐Ÿ’ฐ Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881
This paper is a continuation of the general law of contract and covers four major special contracts under Indian law. Unit I deals with Indemnity, Guarantee, Bailment, Pledge, and Agency โ€” all governed by the Indian Contract Act, 1872. Unit II focuses on the Indian Partnership Act, 1932, covering the nature, rights, liabilities, and dissolution of firms. Unit III examines the Sale of Goods Act, 1930, exploring contractual aspects of commercial transactions. Unit IV introduces the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, dealing with promissory notes, bills of exchange, cheques, and their dishonour. Together, these four statutes form the backbone of Indian mercantile law and are essential for every law student and legal practitioner.

UNIT I: Indemnity, Guarantee and Agency

1.1 Contract of Indemnity (Section 124, Indian Contract Act, 1872)

๐Ÿ“˜ Statutory Definition โ€” Section 124, ICA 1872

โ€œA contract by which one party promises to save the other from the loss caused to him by the conduct of the promisor himself or by the conduct of any person, is called a contract of indemnity.โ€

Indemnifier: The person who promises to indemnify the loss.

Indemnity Holder / Indemnified: The person whose loss is to be indemnified.

A contract of indemnity is a special type of contract under the Indian Contract Act. Its fundamental purpose is to protect one party (the indemnity holder) against financial loss or damage arising from a specific event. The liability of the indemnifier crystallises the moment actual loss is suffered by the indemnified.

The scope of Section 124 is intentionally narrow compared to English law. Under the Indian statute, the loss must flow either from the promisorโ€™s own conduct or from the conduct of a third person โ€” but crucially, accidental loss or loss from natural causes does not create a contract of indemnity under Indian law. English law, by contrast, defines indemnity far more broadly to include losses from accidents and natural causes as well, making the English definition wider.

โš–๏ธ Indian Law vs. English Law โ€” Indemnity
BasisIndian Law (S. 124, ICA)English Law
ScopeNarrower โ€” only conduct of promisor or third partyWider โ€” includes accidents and natural causes
Loss by AccidentNOT coveredCovered
DefinitionStatutory (S.124)Common law โ€” โ€œa promise to save another harmlessโ€
PartiesTwo: Indemnifier and Indemnity HolderTwo parties as well

Features of Contract of Indemnity

  1. The contract is made for protecting the promisee against anticipated or contingent loss.
  2. The liability of the indemnifier starts as soon as the loss occurs to the indemnified.
  3. Indemnification is made for actual loss, not anticipated loss.
  4. The event specified in the contract must actually happen.
  5. If the indemnified caused the loss through his own misconduct, he cannot claim indemnity.
  6. The contract may be express or implied.
๐ŸŸข Illustration โ€” Contract of Indemnity

Example 1: A, an insurance company, promises B that if his house is damaged by fire, A will compensate B for the loss. This is a contract of indemnity. A is the indemnifier and B is the indemnity holder.

Example 2: A tells B to take goods from Cโ€™s shop on credit and promises to save B harmless from any loss. B takes the goods. If B suffers loss, A must indemnify him โ€” this is a classic contract of indemnity arising from the promisorโ€™s direction.

1.2 Rights of Indemnity Holder (Section 125, ICA)

๐Ÿ“˜ Section 125 โ€” Rights of Indemnity Holder

The promisee in a contract of indemnity, acting within the scope of his authority, is entitled to recover from the promisor:

  • (a) All damages which he may be compelled to pay in any suit in respect of any matter to which the promise to indemnify applies.
  • (b) All costs which he may be compelled to pay in any such suit if, in bringing or defending it, he did not contravene the orders of the promisor, and acted as it would have been prudent for him to act.
  • (c) All sums which he may have paid under the terms of any compromise of any such suit, if the compromise was not contrary to the orders of the promisor.

The Indian Contract Act is silent on the rights of the indemnifier โ€” the Act does not expressly provide for the indemnifierโ€™s rights. However, courts have held that upon paying the indemnity, the indemnifier is subrogated to the rights of the indemnity holder, i.e., he steps into the shoes of the indemnity holder and can sue the third party who caused the loss.

Duties of the Indemnifier

Though not explicitly stated in the Act, the indemnifierโ€™s duty to pay arises when:

  1. There is actual damage or loss to the indemnity holder.
  2. The loss or damage was caused by an incident mentioned in the contract.
  3. The indemnity holder acted carefully, prudently and within the authority of the indemnifier.
โš ๏ธ Exam Tip โ€” Important Point on Section 125

A critical distinction: Section 125 does not use the word โ€œindemnifyโ€ but speaks of what the promisee can โ€œrecover.โ€ This implies that the indemnity holder must first suffer the loss before he can claim โ€” he cannot preemptively demand compensation before the loss occurs. However, under English law, the indemnity holder can compel the indemnifier to relieve him from liability even before he has actually paid.

1.3 Contract of Guarantee (Section 126, ICA)

๐Ÿ“˜ Statutory Definition โ€” Section 126, ICA 1872

โ€œA contract to perform the promise or discharge the liability of a third person in case of his default.โ€

Surety / Guarantor: The person who gives the guarantee.

Principal Debtor: The person in respect of whose default the guarantee is given.

Creditor: The person to whom the guarantee is given.

The contract of guarantee is a tripartite arrangement involving three distinct parties and three sets of legal relationships: (a) between the creditor and the principal debtor (creating the primary debt/obligation), (b) between the surety and the creditor (creating the secondary liability), and (c) an implied contract between the surety and the principal debtor (by which the debtor undertakes to indemnify the surety if the surety is required to pay).

Guarantee contracts are most prevalent in the banking and financial sector. Commercial banks, development banks, finance companies, and co-operatives rely heavily on guarantees as security for loans disbursed. The suretyโ€™s liability is secondary and conditional โ€” it arises only when the principal debtor defaults, and the suretyโ€™s primary obligation is merely to ensure performance or payment if the debtor fails.

Essential Features of a Contract of Guarantee

  1. Tripartite agreement โ€” three parties: creditor, surety, and principal debtor.
  2. No misrepresentation or concealment of material facts regarding the contract.
  3. No direct consideration between surety and creditor is necessary โ€” the consideration moving from the creditor to the principal debtor is sufficient to support the suretyโ€™s promise.
  4. Primary liability is of the principal debtor; secondary liability is of the surety.
  5. All parties must be competent to contract.
  6. As a conditional contract, the suretyโ€™s liability arises only on the default of the principal debtor.
  7. Under English and Nepalese law, the guarantee must be in writing; under Indian law, no such form requirement exists.
๐ŸŸข Illustration โ€” Contract of Guarantee

Classic Example: A advances a loan of Rs. 5,00,000 to B. C promises A that if B does not repay the loan, C will do so. This is a contract of guarantee. A is the creditor, B is the principal debtor, and C is the surety.

Example 2: D applies for a job at a company. E stands as guarantor that D will faithfully discharge his duties. E is the surety in a fidelity guarantee. If D commits misconduct resulting in loss to the company, E becomes liable.

1.4 Distinction Between Indemnity and Guarantee

โš–๏ธ Indemnity vs. Guarantee โ€” Comparative Table
Basis of DistinctionContract of IndemnityContract of Guarantee
1. Number of PartiesTwo: Indemnifier and Indemnity HolderThree: Creditor, Surety, Principal Debtor
2. Nature of LiabilityPromisorโ€™s liability is primary and independentSuretyโ€™s liability is secondary โ€” arises only on default of principal debtor
3. Request of DebtorIndemnifier need not act at the request of any specific personSurety must give guarantee at the request of the principal debtor
4. Existing LiabilityOnly a contingency of loss โ€” no existing debtThere is an existing debt or duty being guaranteed
5. Right to SueIndemnifier cannot sue third parties in his own name (unless assignment)Surety who pays the debt is subrogated to all rights of creditor and can sue the debtor in his own name
6. Interest in TransactionIndemnifier often has an interest in the transactionSurety is typically unconnected to the transaction except through the guarantee; must have no financial interest
7. Mode of CreationCan arise from express/implied contract or by operation of lawOnly from express or implied contract between surety and creditor
8. ConsiderationMust have consideration like any other contractConsideration of debtor = sufficient consideration for surety

1.5 Types of Guarantee

1. Absolute and Conditional Guarantee

An absolute guarantee is one where the guarantor unconditionally promises to pay the debt on the default of the principal debtor, without any additional contingency. A conditional guarantee involves a further contingency beyond mere default of the principal debtor.

2. General and Special Guarantee

A general guarantee can be accepted by the general public (e.g., a guarantee by a bank accepted by any member of the public). A special guarantee is one that can only be accepted by a specific, identified person.

3. Limited and Unlimited Guarantee

A limited guarantee fixes the time period, transaction type, or maximum amount for which the surety is liable. An unlimited guarantee covers all transactions without limit of time, amount, or nature.

4. Prospective and Retrospective Guarantee

A prospective guarantee covers future transactions. A retrospective guarantee is given for past or existing transactions, confirming the suretyโ€™s liability for obligations already incurred.

5. Specific and Continuing Guarantee

A specific guarantee extends to a single transaction or debt and is discharged once that transaction is completed or the promise performed. A continuing guarantee (Section 129) extends to a series of transactions and remains operative for multiple dealings over time until revoked.

โš ๏ธ Key Feature of Continuing Guarantee
  • The guarantorโ€™s obligation is NOT exhausted by the first advance โ€” it covers a series of transactions.
  • It can be revoked by the surety by notice to the creditor (but surety remains liable for past transactions).
  • Death of the surety automatically terminates a continuing guarantee for future transactions (unless there is a contract to the contrary).

1.6 Revocation of a Continuing Guarantee (Section 130โ€“131)

A continuing guarantee may be revoked in the following ways:

  1. By notice of revocation by the surety (Section 130): A surety may revoke a continuing guarantee for future transactions at any time by giving notice to the creditor. He remains liable for transactions already entered into before the notice.
  2. By death of the surety (Section 131): Death of the surety automatically terminates the continuing guarantee with respect to future transactions. Notice of death to the creditor is not required.
  3. By other modes:
    • By variance or alteration in the terms of the original contract (without the suretyโ€™s consent)
    • By novation
    • By release or discharge of the principal debtor
    • By loss of security by the creditor
    • By arrangement between the creditor and principal debtor impairing the suretyโ€™s rights
    • By the creditorโ€™s acts that impair the suretyโ€™s eventual remedy against the debtor

1.7 Rights, Duties and Liabilities of the Surety

A. Rights of Surety Against the Creditor

  • Right to Securities (Section 141): On paying the guaranteed debt, the surety is entitled to demand from the creditor all the securities held against the principal debtor. If the creditor loses or parts with such securities without the suretyโ€™s consent, the surety is discharged to the extent of the value of such security.
  • Right to Exoneration (Fidelity Guarantee): In a fidelity guarantee, the surety can call upon the employer/creditor to dismiss the dishonest employee. He may also file a suit for a declaration that the principal debtor is the person primarily liable.
  • Right to Share Reduction: Where multiple sureties exist for the same debtor, all co-sureties share the burden of the debt in proportion to their guarantee.
  • Right to Set-Off: The surety can avail of any counter-claim or set-off that the principal debtor could have used against the creditor in respect of the same transaction.

B. Rights of Surety Against the Principal Debtor

  • Right of Subrogation (Section 140): Once the surety pays the guaranteed debt on the debtorโ€™s default, he steps into the shoes of the creditor and can exercise all the creditorโ€™s rights and remedies against the debtor.
  • Right of Indemnity (Section 145): There is an implied promise by the principal debtor to indemnify the surety for all sums the surety has rightfully paid under the guarantee.

C. Rights of Surety Against Co-Sureties

  • Right of Contribution (Section 146โ€“147): Where there are co-sureties, they must contribute equally (in the absence of contrary agreement) to the discharge of the guaranteed debt. If one co-surety pays more than his share, he has a right to recover contribution from others.

1.8 Bailment (Section 148, ICA)

๐Ÿ“˜ Statutory Definition โ€” Section 148, ICA 1872

โ€œA bailment is the delivery of goods by one person to another for some purpose, upon a contract that they shall, when the purpose is accomplished, be returned or otherwise disposed of according to the directions of the person delivering them.โ€

Bailor: The person who delivers the goods.

Bailee: The person to whom the goods are delivered.

The word โ€œbailmentโ€ derives from the French word โ€œBaillierโ€ meaning to deliver or hand over. A bailment arises when one person transfers possession (not ownership) of movable goods to another for a specific purpose, with the condition that the goods shall be returned after the purpose is accomplished. There is no transfer of title โ€” only possession changes hands.

Essential Elements of Bailment

  1. There must be actual or constructive delivery of goods.
  2. The subject matter must be movable goods (not immovable property).
  3. Delivery must be made by the owner (bailor).
  4. Goods must be delivered to another person (bailee).
  5. Delivery is for a specific purpose.
  6. There must be a condition that goods shall be returned or disposed of as directed by the bailor.
  7. Delivery of possession without ownership โ€” ownership remains with the bailor.
๐ŸŸข Illustrations of Bailment
  • A deposits goods at a railway cloakroom โ€” Bailment (A = bailor, railway = bailee).
  • A lends his horse to B for riding โ€” Bailment for benefit of bailee.
  • A delivers gold to a goldsmith for making ornaments โ€” Bailment for reward.
  • A delivers his car to a parking lot โ€” Bailment for safe custody.
  • A sends his clothes to a laundry โ€” Bailment for reward (non-gratuitous).

1.9 Rights and Duties of Bailor and Bailee

Rights of the Bailor

  • Right to demand return of goods.
  • Right to claim damages in case of baileeโ€™s negligence.
  • Right to claim compensation for unauthorised use of goods.
  • Right to claim compensation if goods are mixed with baileeโ€™s goods without consent (and cannot be separated).
  • Right to terminate bailment if bailee uses goods wrongfully.
  • Right to demand accretions (natural increases) to the goods.
  • Right to return of goods at any time in gratuitous bailment (bail for free).

Duties of the Bailor

  • To disclose defects in goods (Section 150) โ€” Failure makes bailor liable for damage caused to the bailee.
  • To repay necessary expenses incurred by bailee in gratuitous bailment.
  • To pay extraordinary expenses in non-gratuitous bailment.
  • To pay indemnity to the bailee (Section 150) for losses caused by undisclosed defects.
  • To bear risk of loss of goods.

Rights of the Bailee

  • Right to claim indemnity from the bailor for undisclosed defects.
  • Right to claim reimbursement of necessary expenses incurred.
  • Right to exercise right of lien until remuneration is paid (for non-gratuitous bailment).
  • Right to deliver goods to one of several joint bailors.
  • Right to receive remuneration in non-gratuitous bailment.

Duties of the Bailee

  • To take reasonable care of the goods (standard of care varies: for gratuitous bailment, that of ordinary man; for non-gratuitous, higher standard).
  • Not to make unauthorised use of goods.
  • Not to mix goods bailed with his own goods without consent (Section 155โ€“157).
  • To return the goods (Section 160) after the purpose is accomplished.
  • To deliver any accretion to the goods.
  • Not to set up any adverse title against the bailor.

1.10 Right of Lien

A right of lien is the right to retain possession of the property or goods belonging to another until a debt or claim is paid. It is a possessory right โ€” it is lost as soon as possession is surrendered. It is also called โ€œpossessory lien.โ€

Types of Lien

๐Ÿ“˜ Particular Lien โ€” Section 170

โ€œWhere the bailee has, in accordance with the purpose of the bailment, rendered any service involving the exercise of labour or skill in respect of the goods bailed, he has, in the absence of a contract to the contrary, a right to retain such goods until he receives due remuneration for the services he has rendered in respect of them.โ€

Conditions for Particular Lien:

  1. The bailee must have rendered services (labour or skill).
  2. The services must involve exercise of labour or skill.
  3. Services must be in accordance with the directions of the bailor.
  4. The goods must be in possession of the bailee.
  5. There must be no contract to the contrary.
๐Ÿ“˜ General Lien โ€” Section 171

General lien is a right to retain the goods of another as security for a general balance of account. It is available to the following categories:

  1. Bankers
  2. Factors (Mercantile agents)
  3. Wharfingers
  4. Attorneys of High Court
  5. Policy Brokers

All others โ€” in the absence of a contract to the contrary โ€” have only particular lien.

โš–๏ธ Particular Lien vs. General Lien
BasisParticular Lien (S. 170)General Lien (S. 171)
ScopeOnly for services rendered on specific goodsFor general balance of account
RightAvailable to ALL bailees who render skill/labourOnly specific categories: bankers, factors, wharfingers, attorneys, policy brokers
SecuritySecurity for specific chargeSecurity for all dues outstanding
Sale RightsNo right to sellNo right to sell (only retain)

1.11 Pledge / Pawn Contract (Section 172)

๐Ÿ“˜ Statutory Definition โ€” Section 172, ICA 1872

โ€œThe bailment of goods as security for payment of a debt or performance of a promise is called pledge.โ€

Pawnor/Pledgor: The person who pledges the goods (the debtor).

Pawnee/Pledgee: The person to whom goods are pledged (the creditor).

Pledge is a special kind of bailment where the goods are delivered as security for repayment of a debt or performance of a promise. The key difference from ordinary bailment is the element of security โ€” the pawnee can sell the goods in case of default (with notice), whereas an ordinary bailee cannot sell.

Rights of the Pawnor

  • Right to receive back goods after repaying debt, interest, and expenses.
  • Right to receive accretions to the goods.
  • Right to receive notice before sale/auction of pledged goods.
  • Right to surplus amount after sale of goods.
  • Right to redeem goods before sale by repaying the full amount.

Rights of the Pawnee (Section 173โ€“176)

  • Right to retain goods until full payment of debt, interest, and expenses (Section 173).
  • Right to extraordinary expenses incurred for preservation of goods (Section 175).
  • Right to sell on default (Section 176): On default of the pawnor, the pawnee may sell the goods after giving reasonable notice. If sale proceeds are insufficient, the pawnee can sue the pawnor for the deficit; if surplus, must return it to the pawnor.
โš–๏ธ Bailment vs. Pledge โ€” Key Distinctions
BasisBailmentPledge
PurposeVarious: safe custody, repair, hire, etc.Specific: security for loan or promise
SecurityNo security requiredSecurity is the essential element
Right to SellBailee CANNOT sell goodsPawnee CAN sell goods after notice to pawnor on default
ScopeWider โ€” includes all bailmentsNarrower โ€” pledge is a species of bailment
GratuitousCan be gratuitous or non-gratuitousAlways involves consideration (interest)
GoodsOnly movable goodsCan include both movable and immovable
LoanNo loan transactionLoan transaction is essential
Use of goodsBailor can use goods per contract termsPawnee generally cannot use goods (unless permitted)

1.12 Finder of Lost Goods (Section 71)

๐Ÿ“˜ Section 71, ICA 1872

โ€œA person who finds goods belonging to another person and takes them into his custody is subject to the same responsibility as a bailee.โ€

A finder of goods is treated as a bailee of those goods. He owes the same duties as a bailee: to take reasonable care, not to use them for personal purposes, not to mix them with his own goods, to find the true owner, and ultimately to return the goods. However, the finder has certain rights as well.

Rights of the Finder

  • Right to possess goods until the true owner is found.
  • Right to reimbursement of all expenses from the true owner.
  • Right of lien โ€” can refuse to return goods until expenses are paid.
  • Right to sue the true owner for any reward offered for return of lost goods.
  • Right to sell the goods (Section 169) in any of the following cases:
    1. Where the owner cannot be found with reasonable diligence.
    2. Where the owner refuses to pay the expenses.
    3. Where the goods are of a perishable nature or about to lose most of their value.
    4. Where the expenses incurred by the finder amount to two-thirds of the value of the goods.

1.13 Agency (Section 182, ICA)

๐Ÿ“˜ Statutory Definition โ€” Section 182, ICA 1872

โ€œAn agent is a person employed to do any act for another or to represent another in dealings with third persons. The person for whom such act is done, or who is so represented, is called the โ€˜principalโ€™.โ€

Agency is a legal relationship whereby a person (the agent) has authority to act on behalf of another (the principal) and to create legal relations between the principal and third parties. The agent is a mere link between the principal and third parties โ€” he brings them into contractual relationship without himself becoming a party to those contracts.

The two fundamental maxims of agency law are: (i) Qui facit per alium facit per se โ€” He who acts through another acts himself; and (ii) Delegatus non potest delegare โ€” a delegate cannot further delegate.

Characteristics of Agency

  • Agent is appointed at the wish of the principal.
  • Appointment may be express or implied.
  • The principal delegates his authority to the agent.
  • Acts of the agent bind the principal to third parties.
  • No consideration is necessary between principal and agent.
  • The principal must be competent to contract; the agent may be a minor (as the agentโ€™s personal competence is not required โ€” he simply acts as a conduit).
  • Agency is based on good faith (uberrimae fidei).

1.14 Modes of Creation of Agency

1. Agency by Express Agreement

The most common mode. The agreement may be oral or in writing. The usual formal document is a Power of Attorney. Types of Power of Attorney:

  • General Power of Attorney: Authorises the agent to act generally in all matters of the principal.
  • Special Power of Attorney: Authorises the agent for a specific transaction only (e.g., selling a particular property).
  • Particular Power of Attorney: Authorises the agent for a single specific act (e.g., presenting a document before the Registrar).

2. Agency by Implied Agreement

Arises from the conduct, situation, or relationship of the parties without any express appointment. Includes:

  • Agency by Estoppel: Where a person by his words or conduct has led another to believe that a certain person is his agent, he is prevented from denying the existence of agency. Example: A tells B in Cโ€™s presence that A is Cโ€™s agent; C does not contradict; B contracts with A โ€” C is bound.
  • Agency by Holding Out: A branch of estoppel requiring some affirmative or positive act by the principal. Example: A, Bโ€™s domestic servant, regularly purchases goods on credit from C, and B regularly pays. C can assume A is Bโ€™s implied agent.
  • Agency by Necessity: In emergencies where it is impossible to obtain the principalโ€™s instructions and urgent action is required to protect his interests. Conditions: (i) impossible to contact principal; (ii) the action taken was the only practicable course; (iii) agent acted honestly; (iv) real emergency existed.
  • Agency by Operation of Law: Created by statute โ€” for example, every partner is an agent of the firm by operation of law.

3. Agency by Ratification (Ex Post Facto Agency)

Where an agent exceeds his authority or acts without authority, the principal may subsequently ratify (adopt) the act. Conditions for valid ratification:

  1. The agent must have acted on behalf of and in the name of the principal.
  2. The principal must have been in existence and competent to contract at the time of the act.
  3. The principal must have full knowledge of all material facts.
  4. The entire transaction must be ratified โ€” cannot ratify in part and repudiate in part.
  5. Ratification must be within a reasonable time.
  6. The act must not be void or illegal.
  7. Ratification must not injure a third party.
  8. The act must be within the principalโ€™s power at the time of ratification.
  9. Ratification may be express or implied.

1.15 Rights and Duties of Agent

Rights of an Agent

  • Right to remuneration and commission (agreed or reasonable amount).
  • Right to lien (Section 221): Right to retain goods, papers, and other property of the principal until his dues for commission, disbursement and services are paid.
  • Right to stoppage in transit: Where the agent has purchased goods for the principal with his own money, or where the principal is insolvent, the agent can stop the goods in transit.
  • Right to indemnity for lawful acts (Section 222): The principal must indemnify the agent against consequences of all lawful acts done in the exercise of his authority.
  • Right to indemnity for acts done in good faith (Section 223).
  • Right to compensation for undue removal from agency without cause.

Duties of an Agent

  1. To carry out work within the scope of authority.
  2. To follow instructions; in absence, to follow trade custom.
  3. To work with reasonable care, skill, and diligence.
  4. To communicate with the principal in case of difficulty.
  5. Not to make any secret profit beyond agreed remuneration.
  6. To maintain true and correct accounts and render them to the principal.
  7. Not to deal on his own account against the principalโ€™s interests.
  8. Not to delegate authority (subject to exceptions).
  9. Not to set up adverse title against the principal.
  10. Not to use information obtained through agency against the principal.

1.16 Rights and Duties of Principal

Rights of the Principal

  • Right to revoke agency for fraud, excess authority, or deception.
  • Right to instruct the agent in working procedures.
  • Right to claim compensation for negligent or ultra vires acts.
  • Right to demand accounting of any secret profits.
  • Right to reject unauthorised transactions.

Duties of the Principal

  • To pay agreed or reasonable remuneration.
  • To reimburse the agent for expenses incurred in the course of agency.
  • To provide indemnity for consequences of lawful acts and good faith acts.
  • Not to terminate the agency wrongfully.
  • To give reasonable compensation for undue removal of agent.
  • To be responsible for losses caused by agent while executing the agency.

1.17 Delegation of Authority and Sub-Agent

The general rule is: Delegatus non potest delegare โ€” a delegate cannot further delegate. Since the principal appoints the agent on the basis of personal confidence and skill, the agent cannot pass on that authority to a sub-agent without the principalโ€™s consent (Section 190).

Exceptions to the General Rule (Where Agent CAN Delegate):

  1. Where the principal has expressly permitted delegation.
  2. Where the custom of the trade permits delegation.
  3. Where the principal knows the agent intends to delegate and acquiesces.
  4. Where the nature of the authority makes a deputy necessary.
  5. Where the act is purely ministerial (clerical/routine work).
  6. In an unforeseen emergency.

Sub-Agent (Section 191)

๐Ÿ“˜ Section 191 โ€” Definition of Sub-Agent

โ€œA sub-agent is a person employed by, and acting under the control of, the original agent in the business of the agency.โ€

Key points regarding sub-agents:

  • There is no privity of contract between the principal and the sub-agent โ€” so the sub-agent cannot sue the principal for money due.
  • The original agent remains responsible to the principal for the acts of the properly appointed sub-agent.
  • If the sub-agent is appointed improperly (without authority): the principal is not bound, the agent is fully responsible, and the sub-agent is not liable to the principal (except for fraud or wilful wrong).

1.18 Termination of Agency (Sections 201โ€“210)

Agency may be terminated by the following modes:

  1. Revocation by principal (with reasonable notice)
  2. Renunciation by agent
  3. Completion of the purpose for which the agency was created
  4. Expiry of the period of agency
  5. Death of the principal or agent (Section 209)
  6. Insanity of either party
  7. Insolvency of principal (agency terminates; insolvency of agent alone does not terminate)
  8. Destruction of subject matter
  9. Mutual consent
  10. Alien enemy (where principal or agent becomes alien enemy)
  11. Winding up of the company (where principal is a company)
  12. Illegal contract
  13. Termination of authority by the agent through reasonable means
โš ๏ธ Agency Coupled with Interest โ€” Exception to Termination

Where the agent has an interest in the subject matter of the agency (e.g., an agent authorised to sell goods and apply the proceeds to recover his own debt), such agency cannot be revoked unilaterally by the principal and is not terminated by the death or insanity of the principal. This is called โ€œagency coupled with interestโ€ (Section 202).

UNIT II: The Indian Partnership Act, 1932

2.1 Definition of Partnership (Section 4)

๐Ÿ“˜ Statutory Definition โ€” Section 4, Indian Partnership Act, 1932

โ€œPartnership is the relation between persons who have agreed to share the profits of a business carried on by all or any of them acting for all.โ€

Persons who have entered into partnership with one another are called individually โ€œpartnersโ€ and collectively โ€œa firmโ€, and the name under which their business is carried on is called the โ€œfirm nameโ€.

The definition adopted in Section 4 is largely based on the formulation suggested by the English jurist Pollock, with minor modifications. The definition emphasises the fundamental principle of mutual agency โ€” partners, when carrying on the business of the firm, are both agents and principals vis-ร -vis each other. Partnership is not the agreement itself but the relation arising out of an agreement.

2.2 Essentials of Partnership

1. Two or More Persons

There must be at least two persons as principals. The maximum number is restricted by the Companies Act, 1956: 10 persons for banking business and 20 persons for any other business. Exceeding this limit makes the association an illegal association. The word โ€œpersonsโ€ includes both natural and artificial persons โ€” a company can be a partner.

2. Agreement

Partnership must arise from an agreement โ€” it cannot arise by status or operation of law (Section 5). The agreement may be oral or in writing. A written partnership agreement is called a Partnership Deed. The agreement must satisfy the essentials of a valid contract under the Indian Contract Act, 1872.

3. Carrying on of Business

There must be a business โ€” โ€œbusinessโ€ includes every trade, occupation, and profession (Section 2). A partnership formed merely for sharing profits from property without carrying on any business is not a partnership.

4. Sharing of Profits

Partners must agree to share the profits of the business. However, sharing of profits alone does not conclusively establish partnership โ€” creditors receiving a share of profits as interest, employees receiving profit-sharing bonus, and widows of deceased partners receiving profit shares are not partners (Section 6, Explanations).

5. Mutual Agency (Carrying on by All or Any of Them Acting for All)

This is the most crucial test. Every partner must be capable of binding the firm and being bound by acts of the firm. Mutual agency โ€” each partner acts as agent for all the others โ€” distinguishes partnership from co-ownership, joint Hindu family business, and mere profit-sharing arrangements.

๐ŸŸฃ Mode of Determining Existence of Partnership โ€” Section 6

โ€œIn determining whether a group of persons is or is not a firm, or whether a person is or is not a partner in a firm, regard shall be had to the real relation between the partners as shown by all relevant facts taken together.โ€œ

Explanation 1: Sharing of gross returns from property alone does not create partnership.

Explanation 2: Receipt of a share of profits, or payment contingent on profits, does not by itself make a person a partner.

2.3 Distinctions: Partnership vs. Other Associations

โš–๏ธ Partnership vs. Company
BasisPartnershipCompany
Governing LawPartnership Act, 1932Companies Act, 2013
RegistrationOptionalCompulsory
Legal StatusNot a separate legal entitySeparate legal entity (juristic person)
LiabilityJoint, several and unlimitedLimited (by shares or guarantee)
Max Members20 (banking: 10)Private: 200; Public: unlimited
Transfer of InterestRequires consent of all partnersFreely transferable (public companies)
ManagementEvery partner can participateBoard of Directors manages
AgencyEvery partner is agent of firmMembers are NOT agents of company
DissolutionDeath/insolvency of partner dissolves firmPerpetual succession โ€” company continues
Accounts & AuditNot mandatoryMandatory audit and public disclosure
โš–๏ธ Partnership vs. Joint Hindu Family Business
BasisPartnershipJoint Hindu Family Business
Mode of CreationBy agreement (contract)By status โ€” by birth, marriage, adoption
New MembersOnly by consent of all partnersAutomatically by birth/adoption
ManagementAll partners can manageOnly Karta (senior male member) manages
LiabilityUnlimited for all partnersMembers liable only to extent of their share; Karta has unlimited liability
DissolutionBy court/agreementBy partition of family assets
Max Members20 (banking: 10)No limit
Mutual AgencyPresent โ€” all partners are mutual agentsAbsent โ€” only Karta has representative capacity
Right to ProfitsPartner can demand his share of profitsCoparcener can only demand partition

2.4 Types / Duration of Partnership

1. Partnership at Will (Section 7)

๐Ÿ“˜ Section 7

โ€œWhere no provision is made by contract between the partners for the duration of their partnership, or for the determination of their partnership, the partnership is โ€˜partnership at willโ€™.โ€

Such a partnership can be dissolved at any time by any partner by giving notice in writing to all other partners. If there is a provision for duration or for determination, it is not partnership at will.

2. Particular Partnership (Section 8)

๐Ÿ“˜ Section 8

โ€œA person may become a partner with another person in a particular adventure or undertaking.โ€

A partnership for a specific venture or project only. Once the venture is complete, the partnership dissolves automatically. The rights and liabilities of partners are more limited than in general partnership.

๐ŸŸฃ Key Case โ€” Gherulal Parekh v. Mahadeo Das, AIR 1959 SC 781

Facts: Appellant and respondents entered into a particular partnership to carry on wagering contracts with firms of Hapur for one particular season. They agreed to divide profit and loss equally. There was a net loss. The respondent, who had to pay the full amount to Hapur merchants, sued the appellant for his share of the loss.

Held: The Supreme Court held that the partnership was not unlawful under Section 23 of the Contract Act. It was a valid particular partnership, and Section 42 of the Partnership Act applied. The appellant was liable to bear his share of loss.

Principle: A partnership for a single venture is valid if it satisfies the essentials of Section 4 of the Partnership Act.

2.5 Rights and Duties of Partners Inter Se

A. Absolute Duties (Cannot be varied by agreement)

  • Section 9 โ€” Duty to carry on business to the greatest common advantage: Partners must act for the maximum benefit of all, not for personal gain at the expense of co-partners.
  • Section 9 โ€” Duty to render true accounts: Full and frank disclosure of all facts affecting the firm.
  • Section 10 โ€” Duty to indemnify for fraud: Every partner must indemnify the firm for losses caused by his fraud in the conduct of business. This duty cannot be contracted out.

B. Duties Subject to Contrary Agreement

  • Section 12(b) โ€” Duty of due diligence: Every partner must attend diligently to his duties.
  • Section 13(f) โ€” Duty to indemnify for wilful neglect: Partners must indemnify the firm for losses caused by wilful negligence (can be contracted out, unlike fraud).
  • Section 13(a) โ€” Duty to work without remuneration: Partners are not entitled to remuneration for participation in management (unless agreed).
  • Section 13(b) โ€” Duty to contribute equally to losses.
  • Section 15 โ€” Duty to apply firm property exclusively for firmโ€™s business.
  • Section 16 โ€” Duty to account for personal profits (secret profits) and duty not to compete with the firm.

Rights of Partners

  • Section 12(a): Right to take part in the conduct of business.
  • Section 12(c): Right to be consulted on ordinary matters (majority rule); unanimous consent required for fundamental changes.
  • Section 12(d): Right to access, inspect, and copy firmโ€™s books.
  • Section 13(b): Right to share profits equally (or as agreed).
  • Section 13(c)/(d): Right to interest on capital (only out of profits) and right to interest at 6% p.a. on advances.
  • Section 13(e): Right to indemnity for payments made in the ordinary course of business.
  • Section 15: Right to use firmโ€™s property for firmโ€™s business.

2.6 Position of Minor in Partnership (Section 30)

A minor cannot be a partner in a firm (since a minorโ€™s agreement is void ab initio). However, with the consent of all existing partners, a minor may be admitted to the benefits of an existing partnership.

Rights of Minor Admitted to Benefits

  • Right to an agreed share of property and profits.
  • Right to access, inspect, and copy accounts of the firm.
  • His share is liable for the acts of the firm, but the minor is NOT personally liable.
  • Cannot sue for his share except on severing his connection with the firm.

On Attaining Majority โ€” The Six-Month Option (Section 30(5))

Within six months of attaining majority (or of obtaining knowledge of his admission to benefits, whichever is later), the minor must give public notice whether he elects to become a full partner or not. If he fails to give notice within six months, he is deemed to have become a partner.

โš–๏ธ Minor Who Becomes Partner vs. Minor Who Elects Not to Become Partner
AspectElects to Become PartnerElects NOT to Become Partner
Personal LiabilityBecomes personally liable for all acts from date of admission to benefitsNot personally liable; only share liable
Share LiabilityShare remains liable as beforeShare not liable for acts after date of notice
Right to SueCan sue as a full partnerCan sue for his share (as per S. 30(4))
NoticePublic notice to become partnerPublic notice opting out

2.7 Incoming and Outgoing Partners

Admission of a New Partner (Section 31)

No person can be introduced as a partner without the unanimous consent of all existing partners (mutual trust and confidence are the bedrock of partnership). A new partner is not liable for any obligation of the firm incurred before his admission โ€” unless there is a tripartite novation agreement.

Retirement of a Partner (Section 32)

A partner may retire: (a) with the consent of all other partners; (b) in accordance with an express agreement; or (c) in a partnership at will, by giving written notice to all partners. A retiring partner remains liable to third parties for pre-retirement acts until public notice of retirement is given (Section 72).

Expulsion of a Partner (Section 33)

A partner may be expelled by a majority of partners only in exercise of powers conferred by the partnership agreement, and in good faith. Expulsion contrary to good faith is invalid.

Insolvency of a Partner (Section 34)

An insolvent partner automatically ceases to be a partner from the date of adjudication. His estate is not liable for acts after that date.

2.8 Dissolution of Firms (Sections 40โ€“44)

Modes of Dissolution

1. Dissolution by Agreement (Section 40): A firm may be dissolved with the consent of all partners or in accordance with a contract between partners.

2. Compulsory Dissolution (Section 41): A firm is compulsorily dissolved by: (a) adjudication of all or all-but-one partners as insolvent; or (b) happening of an event making the business unlawful.

3. Dissolution on Contingencies (Section 42): Subject to contrary agreement, a firm is dissolved: (a) on expiry of fixed term; (b) on completion of a specific venture; (c) on death of a partner; or (d) on adjudication of a partner as insolvent.

4. Dissolution by Notice (Section 43): In a partnership at will, any partner may dissolve the firm by giving written notice to all other partners of his intention to dissolve. The notice must clearly express the intention and must be final.

5. Dissolution by Court (Section 44): At the suit of a partner, the court may dissolve a firm on grounds of: (a) unsoundness of mind of a partner; (b) permanent incapacity; (c) misconduct of a partner prejudicial to business; (d) wilful or persistent breach of agreement; (e) transfer of whole interest to a third party; (f) perpetual losses making it impossible to carry on business; (g) just and equitable ground.

โš ๏ธ Consequences of Dissolution โ€” Section 45

Even after dissolution, partners continue to be liable to third parties for acts done after dissolution until public notice of dissolution is given. Public notice means: notice to the Registrar (for registered firms) and notice in the local official gazette and one vernacular newspaper circulating in the district.

Exception: No public notice is required for a deceased partner, insolvent partner, or dormant partner.

UNIT III: The Sale of Goods Act, 1930

3.1 Sale and Agreement to Sell (Section 4)

๐Ÿ“˜ Section 4 โ€” Sale and Agreement to Sell

S. 4(1): โ€œA contract of sale of goods is a contract whereby the seller transfers or agrees to transfer the property in goods to the buyer for a price.โ€

S. 4(3): โ€œWhere under a contract of sale the property in the goods is transferred from the seller to the buyer, the contract is called a sale, but where the transfer of the property in the goods is to take place at a future time or subject to some condition thereafter to be fulfilled, the contract is called an agreement to sell.โ€

S. 4(4): โ€œAn agreement to sell becomes a sale when the time elapses or the conditions are fulfilled subject to which the property in goods is to be transferred.โ€

โš–๏ธ Sale vs. Agreement to Sell
BasisSaleAgreement to Sell
Transfer of PropertyImmediate โ€” property passes to buyer at onceFuture โ€” property passes at a future date or on fulfilment of a condition
Type of ContractExecuted contractExecutory contract
RiskPasses to buyer immediatelyRemains with seller until agreement converts to sale
Effect of BreachBuyer can sue for the goods (they belong to him) and damagesBuyer can only sue for damages
Insolvency of SellerBuyer can claim goods (as owner)Buyer is unsecured creditor; can only prove for price paid
Insolvency of BuyerSeller must deliver but can claim price as debtSeller can refuse delivery until price is paid

How a Contract of Sale is Made (Section 5)

A contract of sale is made by an offer to buy or sell goods for a price and the acceptance of such offer. It may: (a) provide for immediate or future delivery; (b) immediate or future payment; (c) payment by instalments. It may be oral, written, partly written or implied from the conduct of the parties. A credit sale is also a โ€œsale.โ€ A verbal contract or contract by conduct (e.g., picking goods off a shelf in a supermarket) is valid.

3.2 Classification of Goods (Section 6)

I. Existing Goods

  • Specific Goods: Goods that are identified and agreed upon at the time of the contract (e.g., โ€œthe specific car with registration no. DL-01-AB-1234โ€).
  • Ascertained Goods: Goods which are identified in accordance with the contract after the contract is made. Originally unascertained but identified later.
  • Unascertained / Generic Goods: Not specifically identified โ€” described by type or class only (e.g., โ€œ50 kg of basmati riceโ€).

II. Future Goods (Section 2(6))

Goods to be manufactured, produced, or acquired by the seller after the making of the contract. A contract to sell future goods operates as an agreement to sell (not a sale), since property cannot pass in goods that do not yet exist.

III. Contingent Goods

A special type of future goods whose acquisition by the seller depends upon a contingency which may or may not happen.

Effect of Destruction of Goods

  • Section 7 โ€” Goods perishing before contract: Contract for the sale of specific goods that have perished (unknown to the seller) is void ab initio.
  • Section 8 โ€” Goods perishing after agreement to sell but before sale: If specific goods perish without fault of seller or buyer before risk passes to the buyer, the agreement is avoided (frustrated).

3.3 Conditions and Warranties (Sections 12โ€“17)

๐Ÿ“˜ Statutory Definitions โ€” Section 12

S. 12(2) โ€” Condition: โ€œA stipulation essential to the main purpose of the contract, the breach of which gives rise to a right to treat the contract as repudiated.โ€

S. 12(3) โ€” Warranty: โ€œA stipulation collateral to the main purpose of the contract, the breach of which gives rise to a claim for damages but not to a right to reject the goods and treat the contract as repudiated.โ€

S. 12(4): Whether a stipulation is a condition or warranty depends on the construction of the contract. A stipulation may be a condition even though called a warranty in the contract.

โš–๏ธ Condition vs. Warranty
BasisConditionWarranty
NatureEssential to main purpose of contractCollateral โ€” subsidiary to main purpose
Breach EffectRight to repudiate contract AND claim damagesOnly right to claim damages (cannot reject goods)
DegradationBreach of condition may be treated as breach of warranty (by waiver or acceptance)Cannot be elevated to condition
ExampleGoods must be of merchantable quality (S.16(2))Goods must be fit for purpose buyer disclosed (collateral)

When Condition Treated as Warranty (Section 13)

  • Voluntary waiver: Buyer may waive the condition and choose to treat its breach as a breach of warranty.
  • Acceptance of goods: If the buyer has accepted the goods (or part thereof) under a non-severable contract, he can only claim damages for breach of condition โ€” he cannot reject the goods.

Implied Conditions in Every Contract of Sale

  • Section 14(a) โ€” Right to sell: Implied condition that the seller has the right to sell the goods. Breach: buyer can return goods and recover full price (even after use โ€” Rowland v. Divall).
  • Section 15 โ€” Sale by description: Where goods are sold by description, there is an implied condition that the goods correspond to the description.
  • Section 16(1) โ€” Fitness for purpose: If the buyer makes known to the seller the particular purpose for which goods are required and relies on the sellerโ€™s skill or judgment, there is an implied condition that the goods are reasonably fit for that purpose.
  • Section 16(2) โ€” Merchantable quality: Where goods are bought by description from a seller who deals in goods of that description, there is an implied condition that the goods are of merchantable quality.

Implied Warranties

  • Section 14(b) โ€” Quiet possession: Buyer shall have and enjoy quiet possession of the goods.
  • Section 14(c) โ€” Freedom from encumbrances: Goods shall be free from any charge or encumbrance in favour of any third party not disclosed to the buyer before the contract.

3.4 Doctrine of Caveat Emptor (Section 16)

The maxim Caveat Emptor means โ€œlet the buyer beware.โ€ The general rule under Section 16 is that there is no implied condition or warranty as to the quality or fitness of goods for any particular purpose โ€” the buyer must examine and satisfy himself before purchasing.

Exceptions to Caveat Emptor

  1. False representation by the seller โ€” seller made a false representation about the goods.
  2. Seller actively conceals a defect โ€” seller concealed a defect that the buyer could not discover on reasonable inspection.
  3. Buyer relied on sellerโ€™s skill (Section 16(1)): Buyer communicated the purpose and relied on the sellerโ€™s judgment. (Case: Priest v. Last; Bombay Burma Trading Corp. Ltd. v. Aga Muhammed)
  4. Sale by description (Section 15): Goods bought by description must correspond to that description.

3.5 Passing of Property (Sections 18โ€“26)

The transfer of general property (legal ownership) from seller to buyer is essential for a sale. Risk generally follows property โ€” once property passes, the buyer bears the risk of loss.

Rules for Passing of Property

  • Section 18 โ€” Unascertained goods: No property passes in unascertained goods unless and until they are ascertained.
  • Section 19 โ€” Specific or ascertained goods: Property passes when the parties intend it to pass.
  • Section 20 โ€” Unconditional sale of specific goods in deliverable state: Property passes when the contract is made, regardless of when payment or delivery occurs.
  • Section 21 โ€” Specific goods not in deliverable state: Property passes when the seller puts the goods into a deliverable state and the buyer has notice.
  • Section 22 โ€” Specific goods โ€” price to be ascertained: Property passes when seller has done what is necessary (weighing/measuring) and buyer has notice.
  • Section 23 โ€” Sale of unascertained goods by description: Property passes when goods of that description in a deliverable state are unconditionally appropriated to the contract with the assent of both parties.
  • Section 24 โ€” Goods sent on approval / sale or return: Property passes when buyer signifies approval, or when he retains goods beyond the agreed or reasonable time without rejection.
  • Section 25 โ€” Reservation of right of disposal: If seller reserves the right of disposal of goods until certain conditions are fulfilled, property does not pass until those conditions are met โ€” even if goods are delivered to a carrier.

3.6 Unpaid Seller (Section 45)

๐Ÿ“˜ Section 45 โ€” Unpaid Seller Defined

The seller of goods is an โ€œunpaid sellerโ€ when:

(a) The whole of the price has not been paid or tendered; or

(b) A negotiable instrument (bill of exchange, cheque) received as conditional payment has been dishonoured.

3.7 Rights of Unpaid Seller

I. Rights Against the Goods (Sections 46โ€“54)

  • (a) Right of Lien (Sections 47โ€“49): The right to retain possession of goods until payment of price. Applies where: goods sold without credit; credit period has expired; buyer is insolvent. Lien is lost when: goods are delivered to carrier without reserving right of disposal; buyer lawfully obtains possession; seller waives the lien.
  • (b) Right of Stoppage in Transit (Sections 50โ€“52): The right to stop goods in transit and resume possession, after the seller has parted with possession, if the buyer has become insolvent. Transit ends when the carrier acknowledges that he holds goods on behalf of the buyer.
  • (c) Right of Re-Sale (Section 54): The seller can resell goods when: goods are perishable; seller has reserved the right of re-sale in the contract; seller gives notice to buyer of intention to re-sell and buyer does not pay within a reasonable time.
  • (d) Right to Withhold Delivery: Co-extensive with right of lien โ€” applies before delivery. If property has not passed, seller can withhold delivery.

II. Rights Against the Buyer (Suits) โ€” Sections 55โ€“61

  • Suit for Price (Section 55): Where property in goods has passed to buyer and buyer wrongfully refuses to pay, seller may sue for the price.
  • Suit for Damages for Non-Acceptance (Section 56): Where buyer wrongfully refuses or neglects to accept and pay for goods, seller may sue for damages.

UNIT IV: The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881

4.1 Definition of Negotiable Instruments (Section 13)

๐Ÿ“˜ Section 13(a) โ€” Negotiable Instrument Defined

โ€œNegotiable instrument means a promissory note, bill of exchange or cheque payable either to order or to bearer, whether the word โ€˜orderโ€™ or โ€˜bearerโ€™ appear on the instrument or not.โ€

Justice Willis: โ€œA negotiable instrument is one, the property in which is acquired by anyone who takes it bona fide and for value notwithstanding any defects of title in the person from whom he took it.โ€

A negotiable instrument is essentially a written document creating a right in favour of some person and which is freely transferable from one person to another. Two conditions must be satisfied for an instrument to be negotiable: (i) it must be freely transferable by delivery or by endorsement and delivery; and (ii) the person who obtains it in good faith and for value must get it free from all defects of title.

Instruments Recognised by Statute:

  • Promissory Notes
  • Bills of Exchange
  • Cheques

Instruments Recognised by Custom / Usage:

  • Hundis
  • Share warrants (bearer)
  • Dividend warrants
  • Bankersโ€™ drafts
  • Circular notes
  • Bearer debentures
  • Railway receipts (in some contexts)

NOT Negotiable Instruments (even though transferable):

  • Money orders, Postal orders
  • Deposit receipts
  • Share certificates
  • Bill of lading
  • Dock warrants

Characteristics of Negotiable Instruments

  1. Property: Possessor is presumed owner; property passes without formality.
  2. Title: Holder in due course gets a clean title free from all defects of prior holders.
  3. Rights: Holder can sue in his own name.
  4. Presumptions: Consideration presumed; date presumed valid; prior endorsements presumed valid.
  5. Prompt Payment: Dishonour ruins the credit of all parties.

4.2 Promissory Note (Section 4)

๐Ÿ“˜ Section 4 โ€” Promissory Note Defined

โ€œA promissory note is an instrument in writing (not being a bank-note or a currency note) containing an unconditional undertaking, signed by the maker, to pay a certain sum of money only to, or to the order of, a certain person, or to the bearer of the instrument.โ€

Essential Elements of a Valid Promissory Note

  1. It must be in writing (ink, pencil, printing โ€” any form that cannot be easily altered).
  2. It must contain an express unconditional promise to pay (mere acknowledgement of debt โ€” โ€œI owe youโ€ โ€” is NOT a promissory note).
  3. The promise must be unconditional.
  4. It must be signed by the maker.
  5. The maker must be certain.
  6. The payee must be certain (by name or designation).
  7. The promise must be to pay money and money only.
  8. The amount must be certain.
  9. Other formalities (date, place, stamp) โ€” not essential at law, though usually included.
๐Ÿ”ด What is NOT a Promissory Note
  • โ€œMr. B, I.O.U. Rs. 500โ€ โ€” no express promise to pay.
  • โ€œI am liable to pay you Rs. 500โ€ โ€” admission of liability, not a promise.
  • โ€œI have taken Rs. 100, whenever you ask I have to payโ€ โ€” conditional.

What IS a Promissory Note: โ€œI promise to pay B or order Rs. 5,000โ€ โ€” valid promissory note with all elements.

4.3 Bill of Exchange (Section 5)

๐Ÿ“˜ Section 5 โ€” Bill of Exchange Defined

โ€œA bill of exchange is an instrument in writing containing an unconditional order, signed by the maker, directing a certain person to pay a certain sum of money only to, or to the order of, a certain person or to the bearer of the instrument.โ€

Parties: Drawer (maker) | Drawee (person ordered to pay) | Payee (recipient of payment)

Classification of Bills

  • Inland Bill: Drawn in India on a person residing in India OR drawn in India payable in India.
  • Foreign Bill: Any bill that is not an inland bill. Usually drawn in sets of three (called โ€œviaโ€) โ€” payment of one set renders others inoperative.
  • Time Bill: Payable after a fixed period.
  • Demand Bill: Payable at sight or on demand.
  • Trade Bill: Drawn and accepted for a genuine trade transaction.
  • Accommodation Bill: Drawn and accepted NOT for a genuine trade transaction but to provide financial help. Neither party owes the other money at the time of drawing.
โš–๏ธ Bill of Exchange vs. Promissory Note
BasisPromissory NoteBill of Exchange
PartiesTwo: Maker + PayeeThree: Drawer + Drawee + Payee
Promise/OrderUnconditional promise to payUnconditional order directing another to pay
AcceptanceNo acceptance requiredMust be accepted by drawee before payment can be demanded
LiabilityMakerโ€™s liability is primary and absoluteDrawerโ€™s liability is secondary and conditional
Notice of DishonourNo notice needed (maker is direct debtor)Notice to drawer and endorsers required
Protest for DishonourNot requiredRequired for foreign bills
Payable to BearerCannot be made payable to bearer on demandCannot be drawn to bearer on demand

4.4 Cheque (Section 6)

๐Ÿ“˜ Section 6 โ€” Cheque Defined

โ€œA cheque is a bill of exchange drawn on a specified banker, and not expressed to be payable otherwise than on demand.โ€

A cheque is a special type of bill of exchange with two additional qualifications: (i) always drawn on a specified banker; and (ii) always payable on demand. All cheques are bills of exchange but not all bills are cheques. A cheque does not require acceptance by the bank.

Types of Cheques / Crossing

  • Open Cheque: Payable over the counter โ€” can be cashed directly.
  • Crossed Cheque: Two parallel lines drawn across the face โ€” payment only through a bank account.
  • General Crossing (Section 123): Two parallel transverse lines with or without words โ€œ& Co.โ€ or โ€œNot Negotiable.โ€
  • Special Crossing (Section 124): Name of a specific bank written within or across the two parallel lines โ€” only that bank can collect payment.
  • โ€œNot Negotiableโ€ Crossing: Holder cannot get better title than the transferor had.
  • โ€œAccount Payeeโ€ Crossing: Amount must be credited only to the payeeโ€™s account.

4.5 Holder vs. Holder in Due Course

๐Ÿ“˜ Section 8 โ€” Holder; Section 9 โ€” Holder in Due Course

Holder (S. 8): โ€œA person entitled in his own name to the possession of a negotiable instrument, and to receive or recover the amount due thereon from the parties thereto.โ€

Holder in Due Course (S. 9): โ€œAny person who for valuable consideration becomes the possessor of a negotiable instrument payable to bearer, or the indorsee or payee thereof, before the amount mentioned in the instrument becomes payable, and without having sufficient cause to believe that any defect existed in the title of the person from whom he derives his title.โ€

Essentials of Holder in Due Course

  1. Must hold for valuable consideration (not by gift or inheritance).
  2. Must become holder before maturity of the instrument.
  3. Must have obtained the instrument in good faith (without notice of any defect in title).
  4. Must have taken with reasonable care โ€” mere good faith without due caution is not sufficient under Indian law.

Privileges of Holder in Due Course

  • Instrument purged of all defects (Section 53): HDC gets clean title despite defects of prior holders. Instrument is like a โ€œcurrent coin.โ€
  • All prior parties remain liable to HDC.
  • Estoppel against original invalidity of instrument (Section 120): Drawer of a bill and acceptor for honour cannot deny original validity against HDC.
  • Estoppel against denying capacity of payee (Section 121).
  • No effect of absence of consideration (Section 58).
  • Can enforce payment even on fictitious bills (Section 42).
โš–๏ธ Holder vs. Holder in Due Course
BasisHolder (S. 8)Holder in Due Course (S. 9)
ConsiderationMay or may not have given valueMust have given valuable consideration
Good FaithNot requiredMust be in good faith without notice of defect
Before MaturityNot requiredMust have obtained before maturity
PrivilegesLimited โ€” acquires no better title than transferor hadProtected from all prior defects; can enforce against all prior parties
English LawSameEnglish law does NOT regard payee as HDC

4.6 Endorsement โ€” Types and Effects

Endorsement is the writing of oneโ€™s name on the back of a negotiable instrument (or on a paper attached to it called โ€œallongeโ€) with the intention of transferring the rights therein. The endorser transfers his rights to the endorsee.

Essentials of Valid Endorsement

  1. Must be on the instrument itself (or allonge).
  2. Must be made by the maker or holder of the instrument.
  3. Must be signed by the endorser.
  4. Must be an endorsement of the entire bill (partial endorsement is invalid).
  5. Must be completed by delivery of the instrument.

Classes of Endorsement

  • Blank / General Endorsement (S. 16): Endorser signs without naming any endorsee. The instrument becomes a bearer instrument transferable by delivery.
  • Special / Full Endorsement (S. 16): Endorser names the endorsee โ€” โ€œPay A or orderโ€ [signature]. Only the named endorsee can negotiate further.
  • Partial Endorsement (S. 56): Purports to transfer only part of the amount โ€” INVALID for negotiation purposes.
  • Restrictive Endorsement (S. 50): Restricts further negotiation โ€” โ€œPay C onlyโ€ or โ€œPay C for my use.โ€ Endorsee gets all rights except right to negotiate.
  • Conditional / Qualified Endorsement: Endorser limits his liability by adding a condition. Includes:
    • Sans Recourse: โ€œPay A or order sans recourseโ€ โ€” endorser excludes his own liability on dishonour.
    • Facultative: Endorser extends his liability or waives a right โ€” โ€œPay A or order. Notice of dishonour waived.โ€
    • Sans Frais: Endorser does not want endorsee to incur any expense on his account.

4.7 Material Alteration (Section 87)

๐Ÿ“˜ Section 87 โ€” Material Alteration

โ€œAny material alteration of a negotiable instrument renders the same void as against anyone who is a party thereto at the time of making such alteration and does not consent thereto, unless it was made in order to carry out the common intention of the original parties.โ€

A material alteration is one that changes the rights and liabilities of the parties. Examples include: alteration of date, amount, place of payment, time of payment, rate of interest, the partiesโ€™ names, or addition of a new party.

Related Provisions

  • Section 88: An acceptor or endorser is bound by his acceptance or endorsement notwithstanding any previous alteration (alteration before he became a party).
  • Section 89: If a materially altered instrument does not appear to have been altered, a banker paying in good faith according to its apparent tenor is discharged from liability.

4.8 Dishonour of Negotiable Instruments

Dishonour by Non-Acceptance (Section 91 โ€” applies to Bills only)

A bill is dishonoured by non-acceptance when:

  1. The drawee fails to accept within 48 hours of presentment.
  2. The drawee is a fictitious person or cannot be found.
  3. The drawee is incompetent to contract.
  4. The bill is accepted with a qualified (conditional) acceptance.
  5. The drawee has become insolvent or died.
  6. Presentment for acceptance is excused and the bill is not accepted.

Dishonour by Non-Payment (Section 92)

Occurs when the acceptor/maker/drawee fails to make payment on the due date. A cheque is dishonoured when the bank refuses to pay.

Notice of Dishonour (Section 93โ€“98)

  • On dishonour, the holder must give notice to all prior parties (drawer and endorsers) he wishes to make liable.
  • No notice needed to: maker of promissory note, acceptor of bill, or drawee (they are primary debtors).
  • Notice may be oral or written.
  • Notice must be given within reasonable time โ€” if parties are in different places, notice must be dispatched by next post; if same place, it should reach next day.
  • Failure to give notice discharges all parties except the maker and acceptor.

Duties of Holder Upon Dishonour

  1. Give Notice of Dishonour (Section 93) to all prior parties he seeks to make liable.
  2. Noting and Protesting (Section 99โ€“100): Holder may have the dishonour noted by a notary public and then โ€œprotestedโ€ โ€” formal certification of dishonour. Required for foreign bills.
  3. Suit for Recovery: After noting and protesting, the holder may sue all parties liable on the instrument.
๐ŸŸฃ Presumptions as to Negotiable Instruments (Sections 118โ€“119)

The following shall be presumed until contrary is proved:

  1. Consideration: Every NI was made/drawn/accepted for consideration.
  2. Date: Dated NI was made on that date.
  3. Time of Acceptance: Bill was accepted within a reasonable time after issue and before maturity.
  4. Time of Transfer: Every transfer was made before maturity.
  5. Order of Endorsement: Endorsements were made in the order they appear on the instrument.
  6. Stamp: A lost NI was duly stamped.
  7. Holder in Due Course: Every holder is presumed to be HDC.
  8. Proof of Protest: Court shall presume dishonour upon proof of protest.

๐Ÿ“ Important Questions for Exam

A. Short Answer Questions (2โ€“5 marks)

  1. Define โ€œContract of Indemnityโ€ under Section 124 of the ICA. How does it differ from English law?
  2. Who is an โ€œindemnity holderโ€? What are his rights under Section 125?
  3. Define โ€œContract of Guaranteeโ€ under Section 126. Who are the three parties?
  4. What is a โ€œcontinuing guaranteeโ€? How is it revoked?
  5. What is the โ€œright of subrogationโ€ of a surety?
  6. Define โ€œbailmentโ€ under Section 148. Give three examples.
  7. Distinguish between โ€œparticular lienโ€ (S. 170) and โ€œgeneral lienโ€ (S. 171).
  8. Define โ€œpledgeโ€ under Section 172. Who are pawnor and pawnee?
  9. What are the rights of a finder of lost goods under Section 71?
  10. What is โ€œagency by estoppelโ€? Give an example.
  11. Define โ€œratificationโ€ in agency law. What are the conditions for valid ratification?
  12. What is the maxim Delegatus non potest delegare? What are its exceptions?
  13. Define โ€œpartnershipโ€ under Section 4 of the Indian Partnership Act, 1932.
  14. What is โ€œpartnership at willโ€ (Section 7)? How can it be dissolved?
  15. What is the position of a minor admitted to the benefits of a partnership under Section 30?

B. Long Answer / Essay Questions (10โ€“15 marks)

  1. Explain the distinction between a contract of indemnity and a contract of guarantee. Illustrate with examples.
  2. Discuss the rights, duties, and liabilities of the surety under the Indian Contract Act, 1872.
  3. What are the essentials of bailment? Explain the rights and duties of the bailor and bailee.
  4. Distinguish bailment from pledge. Explain the rights of the pawnee under the Indian Contract Act.
  5. Explain the various modes of creation of an agency under the Indian Contract Act, 1872.
  6. Discuss the concept of โ€œPartnershipโ€ under the Indian Partnership Act, 1932. Distinguish partnership from a joint stock company and a joint Hindu family business.
  7. Discuss the rights and duties of partners inter se under the Indian Partnership Act, 1932. What are absolute duties?
  8. Explain the modes of dissolution of a firm under the Indian Partnership Act, 1932. What are the consequences of dissolution?
  9. What is โ€œpassing of propertyโ€ in a contract of sale of goods? Discuss the rules for passing of property under Sections 18โ€“25 of the Sale of Goods Act, 1930.
  10. Explain โ€œHolder in Due Courseโ€ under the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. What are his privileges?

C. Problem-Based / Applied Questions

  1. Problem: A guarantees that B, who is employed by C as cashier, will faithfully discharge his duties and account for all moneys entrusted to him. B misappropriates Rs. 2,00,000. A claims he is not liable because the guarantee was limited to Bโ€™s faithfulness in handling goods, not money. Decide.
    Answer Hint: This is a fidelity guarantee. Aโ€™s liability extends to the entire scope of Bโ€™s duties including cash handling. A is liable for the full amount misappropriated.
  2. Problem: A delivers a car to B, a mechanic, for repair. B repairs the car but A refuses to pay. B retains the car. A demands return. Advise B.
    Answer Hint: B has a particular lien under Section 170. He can retain the car until paid for services involving exercise of labour or skill.
  3. Problem: A hands over his watch to B as security for a loan of Rs. 10,000. A defaults. B sells the watch for Rs. 15,000. A demands the surplus Rs. 5,000. Is A entitled?
    Answer Hint: Yes. Under Section 176, after recovering the debt and expenses, the pawnee must return surplus to pawnor.
  4. Problem: X, who was never authorised by Y, enters into a contract with Z on Yโ€™s behalf. Y later ratifies the contract after Z has already revoked it. Is the ratification valid?
    Answer Hint: No. Ratification must be done before the contract has been revoked by the third party. Once Z revokes, Y cannot ratify.
  5. Problem: A firm of three partners โ€” X, Y, and Z โ€” sells specific goods to W for Rs. 5,00,000. W pays Rs. 2,00,000 and promises to pay the balance in 30 days. On the 20th day, W becomes insolvent. What are the unpaid sellerโ€™s rights?
    Answer Hint: The unpaid seller can exercise: (1) right of lien if goods are still in possession; (2) right of stoppage in transit if goods are in transit; (3) right to resell.
  6. Problem: A draws a cheque in favour of B. C steals the cheque, forges Bโ€™s endorsement, and transfers it to D who takes it in good faith and for value. D presents the cheque to the bank. Can D recover?
    Answer Hint: No. A forged endorsement gives no title. D, despite being a HDC, cannot claim as the endorsement chain is broken by forgery. Bankers are protected under Section 85 only for endorsed bearer cheques, not order cheques with forged endorsements.
  7. Problem: A bills of exchange for Rs. 50,000 is drawn by X on Y, payable to Z or order. Y accepts. Z endorses to A. A then materially alters the bill by changing Rs. 50,000 to Rs. 5,00,000 and negotiates to B (HDC). Can B recover Rs. 5,00,000 from Y?
    Answer Hint: No. Under Section 87, material alteration renders the instrument void against Y who did not consent. B can only recover Rs. 50,000 โ€” the original amount โ€” from parties who accepted before alteration (Y), but can recover Rs. 5,00,000 only from parties who became parties after alteration (A).
  8. Problem: A minor of 16 years is admitted to the benefits of a partnership firm. The firm is dissolved when the minor is 17. After the minor turns 18, he does not give any notice. Is he personally liable?
    Answer Hint: A minor cannot exercise the option to become partner where the firm is dissolved before the expiry of the six-month period. He remains with limited liability (only his share is liable, no personal liability). Section 30(5) requires the firm to be in existence for the minor to exercise the option.
  9. Problem: P, an agent, was given authority to sell goods at a minimum price of Rs. 10,000. He sold the goods to Q for Rs. 7,000. Is this binding on the principal?
    Answer Hint: No. P sold beyond the scope of his authority. However, the principal may ratify the transaction. If he does not ratify, he is not bound and can sue P for any loss caused by the unauthorized sale.
  10. Problem: A sells specific goods to B. Before delivery, the goods are accidentally destroyed by fire without the fault of either party. Who bears the loss?
    Answer Hint: If property had already passed to B (e.g., specific goods in deliverable state under an unconditional contract โ€” Section 20), B bears the loss. If property had not passed, the loss falls on A. Risk follows property.

D. MCQ Practice (20 Questions)

1. Under Section 124 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, which of the following is NOT a valid cause of loss for indemnity?

(a) Conduct of the promisor

(b) Conduct of any third person

(c) Natural accident beyond anyoneโ€™s control

(d) Both (a) and (b)

โœ… Answer: (c) โ€” Indian law does not cover accidental losses; English law does.

2. In a contract of guarantee, the person who gives the guarantee is called:

(a) Principal Debtor ย ย  (b) Creditor ย ย  (c) Surety ย ย  (d) Indemnifier

โœ… Answer: (c) Surety

3. Which of the following persons does NOT have a general lien under Section 171, ICA?

(a) Bankers ย ย  (b) Factors ย ย  (c) Carriers ย ย  (d) Policy Brokers

โœ… Answer: (c) Carriers โ€” they have particular lien only.

4. Pledge is defined under which section of the Indian Contract Act?

(a) Section 148 ย ย  (b) Section 170 ย ย  (c) Section 172 ย ย  (d) Section 182

โœ… Answer: (c) Section 172

5. The maxim Qui facit per alium facit per se relates to:

(a) Bailment ย ย  (b) Agency ย ย  (c) Guarantee ย ย  (d) Partnership

โœ… Answer: (b) Agency

6. Under the Indian Partnership Act, 1932, the maximum number of partners for a non-banking business is:

(a) 10 ย ย  (b) 15 ย ย  (c) 20 ย ย  (d) 25

โœ… Answer: (c) 20

7. The mutual agency principle in partnership means:

(a) Partners are employers and employees to each other

(b) Every partner is an agent of the firm for the purposes of its business

(c) Partners can delegate authority without restriction

(d) Only the managing partner has agency authority

โœ… Answer: (b)

8. A minor admitted to the benefits of a partnership is personally liable:

(a) For all debts of the firm from the beginning

(b) Not at all โ€” only his share is liable

(c) Only from the date he attains majority

(d) Only for debts incurred with his consent

โœ… Answer: (b) โ€” During minority, only his share in property and profits is liable; no personal liability.

9. An โ€œagreement to sellโ€ becomes a โ€œsaleโ€ when:

(a) Goods are delivered to buyer

(b) The time elapses or conditions are fulfilled under which property is to transfer

(c) Buyer makes payment of price

(d) Both parties sign a new contract

โœ… Answer: (b) โ€” Section 4(4), Sale of Goods Act

10. The doctrine of Caveat Emptor means:

(a) Seller beware ย ย  (b) Buyer beware ย ย  (c) Bona fide purchase ย ย  (d) None of the above

โœ… Answer: (b) Buyer beware

11. Under Section 20 of the Sale of Goods Act, property in specific goods in a deliverable state passes to the buyer:

(a) When price is paid ย ย  (b) When goods are delivered ย ย  (c) When the contract is made ย ย  (d) When goods are ascertained

โœ… Answer: (c) When the contract is made

12. An unpaid sellerโ€™s right to stop goods in transit arises when:

(a) Buyer becomes insolvent and seller has parted with possession

(b) Buyer refuses to accept goods

(c) Seller changes his mind about the sale

(d) Price has not been paid before delivery

โœ… Answer: (a)

13. A negotiable instrument is defined under Section __ of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881:

(a) 4 ย ย  (b) 5 ย ย  (c) 6 ย ย  (d) 13

โœ… Answer: (d) Section 13

14. A Holder in Due Course must NOT have taken the instrument:

(a) For valuable consideration

(b) Before maturity

(c) After maturity or with notice of defect

(d) By endorsement and delivery

โœ… Answer: (c) โ€” Taking after maturity or with notice of defect disqualifies one from being HDC.

15. An endorsement that restricts further negotiation is called:

(a) Blank endorsement ย ย  (b) Special endorsement ย ย  (c) Restrictive endorsement ย ย  (d) Conditional endorsement

โœ… Answer: (c) Restrictive endorsement

16. Material alteration of a negotiable instrument under Section 87 makes it:

(a) Void against all parties

(b) Void only against non-consenting parties who were parties at the time of alteration

(c) Voidable at the option of the holder

(d) No effect โ€” instrument remains valid

โœ… Answer: (b)

17. A cheque is a bill of exchange drawn on:

(a) Any person ย ย  (b) Government ย ย  (c) A specified banker ย ย  (d) The drawer himself

โœ… Answer: (c) A specified banker

18. In agency, the principal MUST be:

(a) A major above 21 years

(b) Competent to contract

(c) Literate and educated

(d) A citizen of India

โœ… Answer: (b) Competent to contract (the agent may be incompetent)

19. Dissolution of a firm by court is governed by:

(a) Section 40 ย ย  (b) Section 41 ย ย  (c) Section 43 ย ย  (d) Section 44

โœ… Answer: (d) Section 44

20. Which of these is a condition implied in every contract of sale under the Sale of Goods Act?

(a) Sellerโ€™s right to sell (S. 14)

(b) Goods shall be of the same colour as the buyer wants

(c) Goods must be sold at a standard market price

(d) Seller must provide a warranty card

โœ… Answer: (a) Sellerโ€™s right to sell is an implied condition under Section 14(a).

โšก Quick Revision Summary

1. Key Definitions at a Glance

TermSectionOne-Line Definition
IndemnityS.124, ICAPromise to save another from loss caused by promisorโ€™s or third partyโ€™s conduct
GuaranteeS.126, ICAPromise to perform or discharge liability of a third person on his default
BailmentS.148, ICADelivery of goods for a purpose with condition of return after purpose is accomplished
PledgeS.172, ICABailment of goods as security for debt or performance of a promise
AgencyS.182, ICARelationship where agent acts for principal to deal with third parties
PartnershipS.4, IPARelation between persons agreeing to share profits of a business carried on by all or any acting for all
SaleS.4, SGAContract where seller transfers property in goods to buyer for a price
ConditionS.12(2), SGAEssential stipulation breach of which gives right to repudiate the contract
WarrantyS.12(3), SGACollateral stipulation breach of which only gives right to damages
Negotiable InstrumentS.13, NIAPromissory note, bill of exchange, or cheque payable to order or bearer
Holder in Due CourseS.9, NIAPerson who takes NI for value, before maturity, in good faith, without notice of defect

2. All Sections Covered โ€” Quick Reference

SectionCoversKey Rule
S.124Contract of IndemnityLoss must be from conduct โ€” not accident
S.125Rights of Indemnity HolderDamages + costs + compromise amounts
S.126Contract of GuaranteeThree parties; suretyโ€™s liability is secondary
S.130โ€“131Revocation of Continuing GuaranteeBy notice or by death of surety
S.140โ€“141Rights of SuretySubrogation + securities from creditor
S.148BailmentDelivery of goods for purpose with return condition
S.170Particular LienRetain goods for services rendered on those goods
S.171General LienBankers, factors, wharfingers, attorneys, policy brokers only
S.172PledgeBailment as security; pawnee can sell on default
S.182AgencyAgent acts for principal; binds principal to third parties
S.4, IPAPartnershipRelation from contract to share profits; mutual agency essential
S.30, IPAMinor in PartnershipCannot be partner; can be admitted to benefits only
S.44, IPADissolution by CourtSeven grounds including unsound mind, misconduct, losses
S.4, SGASale vs. Agreement to SellSale = immediate transfer; Agreement to Sell = future transfer
S.13, NIANegotiable InstrumentPromissory note, bill, cheque โ€” order or bearer
S.87, NIAMaterial AlterationRenders instrument void against non-consenting parties at time of alteration
S.93, NIANotice of DishonourMust be given to all prior parties except maker/acceptor

3. Landmark Cases

CaseYearCourtPrinciple
Mohori Bibee v. Dharmodas Ghose1903PCMinorโ€™s agreement is void ab initio in India
Gherulal Parekh v. Mahadeo Das1959SCValid particular partnership even for wagering contracts (if not unlawful)
K. Jaggaiah v. Venkatasatyanarayanaโ€”AP HCTest is not single transaction but capacity for participation by multiple persons
Priest v. Lastโ€”โ€”If buyer relies on sellerโ€™s skill, implied condition of fitness for purpose applies
Barrow Lane & Ballard v. Philipsโ€”โ€”Contract for specific goods that perished is void (S.7, SGA)
Howell v. Couplandโ€”โ€”Agreement avoided where specific goods perish after agreement but before risk passes (S.8)

4. Golden Rules / Key Principles to Remember

  • ๐Ÿ“Œ Indemnity = 2 parties; Guarantee = 3 parties (suretyโ€™s liability is SECONDARY)
  • ๐Ÿ“Œ Bailment = possession transfers; Pledge = security for debt (pawnee can SELL on default)
  • ๐Ÿ“Œ General lien (BFWAP): Bankers, Factors, Wharfingers, Attorneys, Policy brokers
  • ๐Ÿ“Œ Partnership = Agreement + Business + Profit sharing + MUTUAL AGENCY
  • ๐Ÿ“Œ Minor in partnership = Benefits only; 6-month window on attaining majority; no personal liability during minority
  • ๐Ÿ“Œ Sale = Property passes NOW; Agreement to Sell = Property passes LATER
  • ๐Ÿ“Œ Condition โ†’ breach = repudiate contract + damages; Warranty โ†’ breach = damages ONLY
  • ๐Ÿ“Œ HDC must take: for value + before maturity + in good faith + without notice of defect
  • ๐Ÿ“Œ Material Alteration (S.87) = void against parties at time of alteration who did not consent
  • ๐Ÿ“Œ Notice of Dishonour must be given to drawer and endorsers โ€” NOT to maker/acceptor

5. Memory Aids (Mnemonics)

General Lien โ€” โ€œBFWAPโ€: Bankers ยท Factors ยท Wharfingers ยท Attorneys (HC) ยท Policy Brokers
HDC Essentials โ€” โ€œVGMโ€: Value + Good faith + before Maturity
Dissolution by Court (S.44) โ€” โ€œUIMTPL+Jโ€: Unsound mind ยท Incapacity ยท Misconduct ยท Transfer of interest ยท Perpetual losses ยท just & equitable
Modes of Creating Agency โ€” โ€œEENROโ€: Express ยท Estoppel ยท Necessity ยท Ratification ยท Operation of law
Rights of Unpaid Seller against goods โ€” โ€œLSRโ€: Lien ยท Stoppage in transit ยท Re-sale