Labour Law






Labour Law – LB 403 Notes



Labour Law

Course Code: LB-403 | LL.B. IV Term | Faculty of Law, University of Delhi | January 2026
Prescribed Legislation: The Industrial Relations Code, 2020 (IRC) | The Occupational Safety, Health and Working Conditions Code, 2020 (OSH Code)
Labour Law is the foundation of industrial relations in India — it governs the complex relationships between workers, trade unions, employers, and the State. This course is structured around two of the four Labour Codes enacted in 2019–2020: the Industrial Relations Code 2020 (which consolidates and replaces the Trade Unions Act 1926, Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act 1946, and Industrial Disputes Act 1947) and the Occupational Safety, Health and Working Conditions Code 2020. The course explores the philosophical foundations of labour law (Kahn-Freund, Marxism), trade union law, industrial disputes, standing orders, and occupational health and safety. These codes are yet to be fully notified/implemented — the pre-existing law therefore remains highly relevant and is heavily tested in examinations.

PART A: The Industrial Relations Code, 2020

🟡 IRC 2020 — Overview and Consolidation

The Industrial Relations Code 2020 consolidates, amalgamates, and simplifies three central labour laws:

  1. The Trade Unions Act, 1926
  2. The Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946
  3. The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947

The IRC is one of four Labour Codes enacted by Parliament (along with Code on Wages 2019, Social Security Code 2020, and OSH Code 2020). As of 2025–26, the Labour Codes have not yet been fully notified/implemented — the old laws remain operative. Examinations test both the old law (IDA 1947 etc.) and the IRC 2020 provisions.

Topic 1: Introduction to Labour Law

1.1 Kahn-Freund: Law as a Technique for Regulating Social Power

🔵 Kahn-Freund’s Central Thesis (Labour and Law, Hamlyn Lectures, 1977)

“Law is a technique for the regulation of social power.” This is Kahn-Freund’s foundational insight about labour law. Power — the capacity to effectively direct the behaviour of others — is unequally distributed in all societies. In the employment relationship, the employer has vastly greater economic power than the individual worker.

Labour law serves to regulate this power imbalance through three mechanisms:

  1. Auxiliary Law: Rules that facilitate and support collective bargaining — recognising trade unions, providing for freedom of association, enabling collective agreements. The state stands back and allows the parties to regulate their own relationships.
  2. Restrictive Law: Rules that regulate collective power — including regulation of strikes, picketing, and collective agreements.
  3. Protective Law: Rules that directly protect workers — minimum wage, safety standards, hours of work, maternity benefit. These apply regardless of collective bargaining.
🟡 Kahn-Freund’s Key Insight: The Role of Collective Bargaining

Kahn-Freund argues that the most effective regulation of the employment relationship is through collective bargaining — workers collectively organising to counterbalance the employer’s economic power. Law’s primary role is to protect workers’ freedom to organise and bargain collectively. Direct legal intervention (minimum wage, safety standards) is a second-best substitute for effective collective bargaining — when workers are too weak or disorganised to bargain effectively, the law must intervene directly.

This insight explains why Indian labour law: (a) recognises and protects trade unions; (b) gives trade unions immunities from criminal and civil liability; (c) mandates minimum wages and safety standards as a floor below which bargaining cannot descend.

1.2 Marxism and Labour Law

🔵 Marxist Analysis of Labour Law

Based on Hugh Collins, Marxism and Law (Clarendon Press, 1982). The Marxist critique identifies several key features of labour law under capitalism:

  1. Law Legitimises Exploitation: The employment contract appears to be a free agreement between equals, but it actually masks the compulsion of the worker — who must work or starve. The law enforces this contract, thereby legitimising the extraction of surplus value.
  2. Freedom of Contract as Fiction: The “freedom” of the worker to contract is illusory — they are not free to not work. The formal equality of the parties (employer and employee both “free” to enter/exit the contract) conceals substantive inequality.
  3. Law as Class Instrument: Labour law reflects the interests of the dominant capitalist class. When workers organise, law initially criminalised their combination (Combination Acts 1799–1800 in England). Only after sustained working-class struggle were trade unions legalised. Law changes only when the balance of class forces demands it.
  4. Contradictions in Labour Law: Labour law is contradictory — it both protects workers (setting minimum standards) and serves capital (regulating and limiting strikes, enforcing contracts). This contradiction reflects the contradictions of capitalism itself.
  5. Social Democracy vs. Marxism: Social democrats believe labour law can be reformed to achieve genuine equality. Marxists argue that only fundamental change in the mode of production can eliminate exploitation — labour law can ameliorate but not eliminate oppression under capitalism.

1.3 History and Development of Labour Law in India

Indian labour law developed in three phases:

  • Colonial Period (pre-1947): First labour legislation was the Factories Act 1881 (regulating working hours of women and children in textile factories). Other colonial-era laws: Workmen’s Compensation Act 1923; Trade Unions Act 1926; Payment of Wages Act 1936. The Colonial State regulated labour primarily to meet the needs of British commercial interests — not for worker welfare.
  • Post-Independence Era (1947–1991): Massive expansion of labour legislation in the welfare state model: Industrial Disputes Act 1947; Factories Act 1948; ESI Act 1948; Minimum Wages Act 1948; Payment of Bonus Act 1965; Payment of Gratuity Act 1972. Constitutional Directive Principles (Articles 39, 41, 42, 43, 43A) mandated state intervention for workers’ welfare.
  • Post-Liberalisation (1991–present): Pressure to reduce labour market rigidities for economic growth. Culminated in the Four Labour Codes (2019–2020) — Code on Wages; IRC; Social Security Code; OSH Code — consolidating 29 central labour laws into 4 codes.

Topic 2: Trade Unions — Definition, Registration and Recognition

2.1 Definition of Trade Union

🔵 Section 2(zl) IRC 2020 — “Trade Union”

“Trade Union” means any combination, whether temporary or permanent, formed primarily for the purpose of regulating the relations between workmen and employers or between workmen and workmen, or between employers and employers, or for imposing restrictive conditions on the conduct of any trade or business, and includes any federation of two or more trade unions.

Section 2(zl), Industrial Relations Code, 2020

Key Characteristics: (a) Combination — an association of persons; (b) Temporary or permanent; (c) Primary purpose — regulating relations between workmen and employers (or workmen-workmen, or employer-employer); (d) Includes federations.

🔵 Section 2(zm) — “Trade Union Dispute”

Any dispute between workmen and employers or between workmen and workmen or between employers connected with the employment or non-employment or the terms of employment or conditions of labour of any person or which is connected with an activity of a registered trade union.

2.2 Registration of Trade Unions

🔵 Application for Registration (IRC Sections 5–14)

Who Can Apply (Section 5): Any seven or more members of a trade union may apply for registration to the Registrar of Trade Unions.

Requirements for Registration (Section 8): The Registrar shall register the trade union if: (a) the application complies with the IRC; (b) the name is not identical or deceptively similar to any existing registered trade union; (c) the trade union has members who are workmen employed in the industry in relation to which the union is being registered.

IRC 2020 Change — Minimum Membership: At least 10% of workers or 100 workers (whichever is less) in the establishment/industry must be members of the trade union for it to be registered. (Older requirement: only 7 members).

Certificate of Registration: On being satisfied, the Registrar issues a Certificate of Registration — making the trade union a body corporate with perpetual succession and common seal, capable of suing and being sued.

Cancellation of Registration

The Registrar may cancel registration if: (a) the union has obtained registration by fraud/misrepresentation; (b) the union has ceased to exist; (c) the union has wilfully/persistently violated provisions of the IRC after 2 months’ notice; (d) the union ceases to have the prescribed minimum membership (10% or 100 workers, whichever is less).

2.3 Negotiating Union / Negotiating Council — Section 14 IRC 2020

🔵 Section 14 IRC 2020 — Negotiating Union

One of the most significant innovations of the IRC 2020 is the concept of a Negotiating Union/Negotiating Council for collective bargaining:

Where single union: If there is only one registered trade union operating in an establishment, that union shall be recognised as the Sole Negotiating Union by the employer.

Where multiple unions: Where there are multiple unions:

  • If a union has 51%+ of workers as members → recognised as the Sole Negotiating Union
  • If no union has 51%+ membership → a Negotiating Council shall be formed consisting of representatives of unions with at least 20% of workers as members
  • The Negotiating Council negotiates on behalf of all workers — it is a mechanism for structured collective bargaining even when no single union dominates

Recognition Period: Negotiating Union/Council recognised for 3 years — after which fresh verification of membership is required.

Under the old Trade Unions Act 1926, there was no provision for recognition of trade unions — unions could be registered but need not be recognised by employers for collective bargaining. Section 14 IRC 2020 addresses this crucial gap.

2.4 Key Cases on Trade Union Registration

🟣 Rangaswami v. Registrar of Trade Unions | AIR 1962 Mad. 231 | Madras High Court

Facts: The Registrar refused to register the Union of Employees of the Madras Raj Bhavan (Governor’s household) as a trade union, holding that Raj Bhavan was not an “industry” under the Trade Unions Act.

Held: The Madras HC held that the definition of “industry” in the Industrial Disputes Act is relevant for the Trade Unions Act — since the IDA and TUA form part of an integrated system of labour regulation. The court held that the activities of the Raj Bhavan could potentially constitute an “industry” — the employees who perform services there fall within the category of workmen who can form a trade union.

Principle: Government employees can form trade unions; the definition of “industry” in the IDA is relevant when interpreting “industry” under the Trade Unions Act. The two Acts form an integrated legislative system.
🟣 Food Corporation of India Staff Union v. FCI | AIR 1995 SC 1344 | Supreme Court

Facts: Trade union of FCI employees sought recognition for collective bargaining. FCI argued it was not obliged to recognise any particular union.

Held: The Supreme Court held that there is no fundamental right to recognition (collective bargaining recognition) of a trade union under the Constitution — Article 19(1)(c) only guarantees the right to form associations. However, international conventions (ILO Convention No. 87 and 98) recognise collective bargaining as a right. The Court encouraged voluntary recognition by management and legislative action to mandate recognition.

Principle: There is no absolute fundamental right to recognition for collective bargaining under Article 19(1)(c) — recognition is a policy matter for legislation. The IRC 2020’s Section 14 (Negotiating Union) fills this legislative gap by mandating recognition based on majority membership.

Topic 3: Immunities of Trade Unions

3.1 Criminal Immunity — Section 15 IRC 2020

🔵 Section 15 — Criminal Immunity

A registered trade union shall not be liable to criminal prosecution for any act done in furtherance of a trade dispute by or on behalf of the trade union, if such act would not be punishable as an offence under the Indian Penal Code (or BNS 2023) but for this section — meaning, if it is done in contemplation or furtherance of a trade dispute, it shall not be an offence even if it would otherwise have constituted criminal conspiracy or other offences (e.g., Section 61 BNS — criminal conspiracy).

Purpose: Without this immunity, virtually all collective action (strikes, picketing, organising boycotts) could be prosecuted as criminal conspiracy. The immunity is necessary for trade unions to function.

Limitation: The immunity applies only to registered trade unions acting in furtherance of a trade dispute. It does not apply to: acts of violence; coercion; damage to property; or offences not related to labour disputes.

🟣 R.S. Ruikar v. Emperor | AIR 1935 Nag. 149 | Nagpur High Court

Facts: Leaders of a trade union were prosecuted for criminal conspiracy for organising a strike — the strike had been held to be an illegal strike under the then law.

Held: The HC held that the immunity under the Trade Unions Act (now Section 15 IRC) was limited to acts done in contemplation or furtherance of a trade dispute. The immunity did not protect illegal strikes or acts of violence. The organisers of an illegal strike could be prosecuted for criminal conspiracy where the underlying act was itself unlawful.

Principle: Criminal immunity for trade unions has limits — it does not protect illegal strikes or acts of violence; the immunity is available only for acts in furtherance of a bona fide trade dispute conducted through lawful means.

3.2 Civil Immunity — Section 16 IRC 2020

🔵 Section 16 — Civil Immunity (Tort Immunity)

No suit or other legal proceeding shall be maintainable in any civil court against any registered trade union or any officer or member thereof in respect of any act done in contemplation or furtherance of a trade dispute to which a member of the trade union is a party, on the ground only that such act induces some other person to break a contract of employment or that it is an interference with the trade, business, or employment of some other person, or with the right of some other person to dispose of his capital or his labour as he wills.

Purpose: Without civil immunity, every strike would expose trade union officers to suits for inducing breach of contract or interference with business (economic torts). The immunity ensures that unions can organise strikes without fear of massive damages claims.

3.3 Trade Union Funds — Section 17 IRC 2020

The general funds of a registered trade union shall not be spent except for the following objects: (a) salaries, allowances, and expenses of officers; (b) expenses for administration; (c) prosecution/defence of members in cases related to their occupation/employment; (d) compensation to members for loss arising out of a trade dispute; (e) allowances to members on sickness, accident, or funeral; (f) educational, social, or religious benefits; (g) contributions to political fund (if separately constituted).

Political Fund (Section 17): A registered union may form a separate political fund for the purpose of: supporting candidates for election; making party-political contributions; and other political activities. The political fund must be kept separate. Members who have not contributed to the political fund cannot be refused membership or subjected to any disadvantage.

Topic 4: ‘Industry’ — Conceptual Analysis

🔵 Section 2(p) IRC 2020 — “Industry”

The IRC 2020 adopts the same definition of “industry” as Section 2(j) of the old IDA 1947. The Supreme Court’s interpretation in the Bangalore Water Supply case (AIR 1978 SC 548) remains the definitive authority.

Triple Test (Bangalore Water Supply):

  1. Systematic activity
  2. Carried on by cooperation between employer and workmen
  3. For the production, supply, or distribution of goods or services to satisfy human wants

All three must be satisfied. The nature of the organisation (government/private/charitable), its motive (profit/non-profit), and its ownership are irrelevant.

🟣 State of U.P. v. Jai Bir Singh | (2005) 5 SCC 1 | Supreme Court (5-Judge Constitution Bench)

Facts: Challenge to the Bangalore Water Supply judgment’s broad interpretation of “industry.”

Held: A 5-judge Constitution Bench declined to overrule Bangalore Water Supply but held that sovereign functions of the State (police, judiciary, legislative activities, revenue administration) are NOT “industry” — they are inherently governmental functions performed by the State in its sovereign capacity. The court held that the broad sweep of Bangalore Water Supply needed to be limited to exclude these core sovereign functions.

Principle: Sovereign functions of the State — policing, adjudication, legislation, and core administrative functions — are NOT “industry” even after Bangalore Water Supply. The distinction is between sovereign and non-sovereign governmental functions: the latter may be industry, the former never are.
⚫ Distinction: Industry vs. Not-Industry
IS “Industry”NOT “Industry”
Government hospital/dispensary (Safdarjung case)Police (sovereign function)
Municipality providing water/sewerage (Bangalore Water Supply)Judiciary
University (Osmania University case)Legislature and secretariat
Club providing services to members (Cricket Club of India)Revenue/tax collection (sovereign)
Charitable hospital with systematic activityRaj Bhavan household services (debated)

Topic 5: Industrial Dispute vs. Individual Dispute

🔵 The Distinction and Its Importance

Under the IDA 1947, jurisdiction of Industrial Tribunals was generally limited to “industrial disputes” — disputes of collective concern to workers generally. A purely “individual” dispute (one workman’s personal grievance, not supported by a union or body of workmen) was NOT an “industrial dispute” and fell outside the Tribunal’s jurisdiction.

This distinction has been significantly modified by Section 2(q) of the IRC 2020, which now allows individual disputes of any workman whose services have been retrenched or who has been dismissed, discharged, or terminated to be raised as industrial disputes — directly, without requiring a union or fellow workmen to take up the cause.

🟣 Workmen of Dimakuchi Tea Estate v. Management | AIR 1958 SC 353 | Supreme Court

Facts: One workman (Dr. Banerjee, Assistant Surgeon) was dismissed from service. No other workman joined the dispute. The question was whether this was an “industrial dispute.”

Held: An individual dispute becomes an “industrial dispute” only if it is taken up by a union of workmen or a considerable body of workmen as their cause — with genuine community of interest. The mere fact that one workman is dismissed does not make it an industrial dispute. For it to become an industrial dispute, there must be: (a) participation by a union or a body of workmen; (b) genuine community of interest; (c) the dispute must be one in which workmen as a class have a real stake.

Principle: A purely individual dispute becomes an industrial dispute only when it is espoused by a union or body of workmen with a community of interest. A lone workman’s grievance, not supported by fellow workers or union, is NOT automatically an industrial dispute.
🟣 J.H. Jadhav v. Forbes Gokak Ltd. | (2005) 3 SCC 202 | Supreme Court

Facts: A single workman raised a dispute regarding retrenchment compensation under the IDA 1947. No union supported the claim.

Held: The Supreme Court held that Section 2A of the IDA 1947 (inserted by 1965 amendment) changed the position — it provides that where any employer discharges, dismisses, retrenches, or otherwise terminates the services of an individual workman, any dispute or difference between that workman and his employer connected therewith shall be deemed to be an industrial dispute notwithstanding that no other workman nor any union of workmen is a party to the dispute. The individual workman can directly raise the dispute.

Principle: After Section 2A IDA 1947 (now incorporated in IRC 2020), individual workmen whose services are terminated can directly raise an industrial dispute without union support or espousement by fellow workers.

Topic 6: Concept of ‘Workman’ and ‘Employee’

6.1 Contract for Services vs. Contract of Service

⚫ Key Distinction
BasisContract of Service (Employment)Contract for Services (Independent Contract)
RelationshipMaster-servant / employer-employeePrincipal-independent contractor
ControlEmployer controls HOW the work is done (not just the result)Principal controls only the RESULT, not the method
IntegrationWorker is part of the employer’s business (integral component)Contractor is not part of the employer’s business (accessory component)
Legal protectionFull labour law protection appliesGenerally outside labour law protection
TaxTDS on salary; PF deductionTDS on professional fees; no PF
ExampleA factory worker employed by XYZ Ltd.A freelance IT consultant hired by XYZ Ltd. for a specific project

Tests for Determining Employment Relationship

  • Control and Supervision Test (Traditional): If the employer can direct not only WHAT work is to be done but HOW it is to be done, the person is an employee. This was the traditional test in Dharangadhra Chemical Works Ltd. v. State of Saurashtra (AIR 1957 SC 264).
  • Integration Test (Denning LJ): Is the person integrated into the employer’s business? An employee is part of the business; a contractor does work for the business but is not of it.
  • Predominant Nature of Duty Test: In H.R. Adyanthaya v. Sandoz (India) Ltd. (1994) 5 SCC 737 — where an employee performs both supervisory and other duties, the predominant nature of the duties determines whether they are a “workman.” If primarily supervisory/managerial = not workman.
🟣 A. Sundarambal v. Government of Goa | AIR 1988 SC 1700 | Supreme Court

Facts: Teachers in government-aided schools claimed to be “workmen” under the IDA 1947 to avail of industrial dispute remedies.

Held: The Supreme Court held that teachers who impart education are NOT “workmen” under IDA 1947. Teaching is not “skilled, unskilled, manual, operational, clerical or supervisory” work within the meaning of Section 2(s) IDA. Teachers engage in a special professional activity that cannot be classified within these categories.

Principle: Teachers do not fall within the definition of “workman” under IDA 1947 — teaching is a professional activity distinct from the categories of work specified in Section 2(s). However, non-teaching staff of educational institutions may be workmen.

Topic 7: Strike and Lock-Out

7.1 Legality and Justification of Strike

🔵 Definitions: Strike and Lock-Out

Strike [Section 2(zk) IRC 2020]: Cessation of work by a body of persons employed in any industry acting in combination, or a concerted refusal of a number of persons to continue to work or to accept employment.

Lock-Out [Section 2(u) IRC 2020]: Temporary closing of a place of employment, or the suspension of work, or the refusal by an employer to continue to employ any number of persons employed by him.

Restrictions on Strikes and Lock-Outs under IRC 2020

🔵 Sections 62–64 IRC 2020 — Prohibition of Strikes and Lock-Outs

Notice Requirement (Section 62): No person employed in an industrial establishment shall go on strike in breach of contract without giving 14 days’ notice (notice period: 14–60 days) to the employer before going on strike. For public utility services, 14 days’ notice is mandatory.

When Strike is Prohibited (Section 62): A strike is prohibited during: (a) pendency of conciliation proceedings and 7 days after conclusion; (b) pendency of arbitration proceedings and 60 days after conclusion; (c) pendency of proceedings before a Tribunal and 60 days after conclusion; (d) during the operation of an award.

Change in Conditions (Section 63): No employer shall alter the service conditions of a workman to his prejudice without giving 21 days’ notice to the workman — this protects workmen from arbitrary changes to their terms of employment while a dispute is pending.

Legal vs. Illegal Strike

FeatureLegal StrikeIllegal Strike
Notice14 days’ notice givenNo notice or notice period not observed
TimingNot during prohibited periodDuring pendency of proceedings/award operation
FormPeaceful cessation of workViolence, intimidation, or sabotage involved
WagesWorkmen entitled to wages (if strike is justified)Workmen not entitled to wages during illegal strike
ConsequenceProtected by law; employer cannot dismiss without proper procedureWorkmen may be dismissed; liable to penalties under IRC
🟣 Syndicate Bank v. K. Umesh Nayak | (1994) 5 SCC 572 | Supreme Court

Facts: Bank employees went on strike. The question was whether the strike was legal and whether employees were entitled to wages for the strike period.

Held: The Supreme Court distinguished between: (a) Legality of strike — whether the procedural requirements (notice, non-prohibited period) were observed; and (b) Justification of strike — whether the substantive cause for the strike was valid. An illegal strike may still be justified if the cause is legitimate; a legal strike may be unjustified if the cause is frivolous. Wages for a strike period depend on whether the strike was both legal AND justified.

Principle: Legality (procedure) and justification (substance) of a strike are distinct enquiries. Both must be examined. Workers are entitled to wages for a legal and justified strike; wages may be denied for an illegal strike or an unjustified strike.

7.2 Standing Orders

🔵 Standing Orders — Chapter IV IRC 2020

Standing Orders are conditions of employment formally certified by the government for application in an industrial establishment. They provide the terms and conditions of employment — working hours, shifts, leave, misconduct, disciplinary procedure, dismissal, etc.

Applicability: Every industrial establishment employing 300 or more workmen (reduced from 100 under the old IESO Act 1946 by IRC 2020 — but subject to state government notification).

Procedure: The employer must submit draft standing orders to the Certifying Officer (Labour Commissioner/Deputy LC). Workers/union must be consulted. After hearing both sides, the Certifying Officer certifies (or modifies) the standing orders. Certified standing orders are binding on all workers in the establishment.

Model Standing Orders: Where no standing orders are submitted/certified, the Model Standing Orders (prescribed by the Central Government) automatically apply.

Matters covered: Classification of workers; attendance and hours; holidays; leave; pay; termination of employment; misconduct and punishment; notice periods; grievance procedures.

7.3 Government Servants’ Right to Strike

🟣 T.K. Rangarajan v. Government of Tamil Nadu | (2003) 6 SCC 581 | Supreme Court

Facts: About 1.7 lakh Tamil Nadu government employees went on an indefinite strike demanding better pay and service conditions. The government dismissed many of them. The employees challenged the dismissals claiming a constitutional right to strike.

Held: The Supreme Court held (unanimously): (a) there is NO fundamental right to strike under Article 19(1)(c) — Article 19(1)(c) guarantees the right to form associations/unions but does NOT include the right to strike; (b) there is no statutory right for government employees to strike; (c) a strike by government employees, especially those providing essential services, causes public harm and is not a legitimate exercise of their rights; (d) mass dismissals of striking government employees were upheld as valid.

Principle: Government servants have NO fundamental right to strike. Article 19(1)(c) guarantees freedom of association but does not extend to the right to take collective action such as striking. A strike by government employees is illegal and they can be dismissed for going on strike.
🟡 ILO Position on Right to Strike

The ILO Committee on Freedom of Association has held that the right to strike is an essential corollary to the right to freedom of association and collective bargaining (ILO Convention No. 87 and 98). The ILO allows limited restrictions on government employees’ right to strike (essential services) but does not permit complete prohibition. The Supreme Court’s T.K. Rangarajan decision has been criticised for being inconsistent with India’s international labour obligations.

Topic 8: Lay-Off, Retrenchment and Closure

8.1 Lay-Off

🔵 Lay-Off — Definition and Compensation

Definition [Section 2(h) IRC 2020]: “Lay-off” means the failure, refusal or inability of an employer on account of shortage of coal, power, or raw materials, or the accumulation of stocks, or the breakdown of machinery or natural calamity or for any other connected reason to give employment to a workman whose name is on the muster rolls of his industrial establishment and who has not been retrenched.

Key Points: (a) The workman’s name MUST be on the muster roll; (b) The lay-off must be for specified reasons — it cannot be arbitrary; (c) The workman is NOT retrenched — the employer-employee relationship continues; (d) Lay-off is temporary — the workman expects to return to work.

Lay-Off Compensation [Section 78 IRC 2020]: A laid-off workman (except a badli/casual workman) is entitled to compensation at 50% of his basic wages and dearness allowance for the period of lay-off. Maximum lay-off compensation period = 45 days in any 12-month period for establishments with fewer than 50 workmen.

Prior Permission for Lay-Off [Section 79 IRC 2020]: Establishments employing 300+ workmen must obtain prior government permission before laying off workers (previously 100 workmen under old IDA — increased to 300 by IRC 2020).

8.2 Retrenchment

🔵 Retrenchment — Definition and Prerequisites

Definition [Section 2(t) IRC 2020 / old Section 2(oo) IDA]: “Retrenchment” means the termination by the employer of the service of a workman for any reason whatsoever, otherwise than as a punishment inflicted by way of disciplinary action, but does NOT include:

  • Voluntary retirement of the workman
  • Retirement of the workman on reaching superannuation age
  • Termination of service of a workman on ground of continued ill-health
  • Non-renewal of contract of employment

Prerequisites for Valid Retrenchment [Section 80 IRC 2020]:

  1. One month’s notice in writing (or one month’s wages in lieu of notice) to the workman
  2. Retrenchment compensation at the rate of 15 days’ average wages for every completed year of continuous service (or part thereof in excess of 6 months)
  3. Notice in the prescribed form to the appropriate government

Prior Permission [Section 81 IRC 2020]: Establishments employing 300+ workmen must obtain prior government permission for retrenchment (formerly 100 under old IDA — increased by IRC 2020).

🟣 Punjab Land Development and Reclamation Corporation Ltd. v. Presiding Officer | (1990) 3 SCC 682 | Supreme Court

Issue: Whether “retrenchment” means only discharge of surplus labour (narrow meaning) or includes any termination for any reason other than disciplinary action (broad meaning).

Held: The Supreme Court (after extensively reviewing the legislative history) held that “retrenchment” in Section 2(oo) IDA has a wider, literal meaning — it means termination of service of a workman by the employer for any reason whatsoever, otherwise than as punishment inflicted by way of disciplinary action, and those expressly excluded by the definition. It is not limited to discharge of surplus labour alone. Any termination (except the excluded categories) = retrenchment.

Principle: Retrenchment has a wide meaning — any termination of a workman’s service for any reason (other than disciplinary action or the specifically excluded categories) constitutes “retrenchment” requiring compliance with Section 25F/80 prerequisites.

8.3 Last-In-First-Out (LIFO) Principle

🔵 Section 80(2) IRC 2020 — LIFO Principle

Where any workman in a particular category in an establishment is to be retrenched, and if there is more than one workman in that category, the employer shall ordinarily retrench the workman who was the last to be employed in that category — unless, for reasons to be recorded in writing, the employer retrenches any other workman. This is the LIFO (Last-In-First-Out) principle.

Purpose: LIFO protects senior employees from arbitrary selection for retrenchment. Seniority (length of service) is the primary criterion — the most recently hired go first.

Exception: Employer may depart from LIFO if reasons are recorded in writing — e.g., where a junior worker has skills essential to the establishment that the senior does not possess.

Right of Re-Employment: When the employer proposes to re-employ workmen in the same category, retrenched workmen have a preferential right to be re-employed over other persons — they must be given 14 days’ notice of the vacancy. This is the right of re-employment under Section 80(3) IRC 2020.

8.4 Closure

🔵 Closure — Definition and Consequences

Definition [Section 2(zh) IRC 2020]: “Closure” means the permanent closing down of a place of employment or part thereof.

Notice of Closure: Every employer who intends to close down an establishment must give 60 days’ notice (in writing) to the appropriate government — specifying the reasons for closure.

Prior Permission [Section 82 IRC 2020]: Establishments employing 300+ workmen must obtain prior government permission before closure.

Compensation on Closure: Workmen whose services are terminated on account of closure are entitled to compensation equal to 15 days’ average wages for each completed year of continuous service.

Closure vs. Retrenchment: Closure is permanent closing of the entire establishment or part — all workmen are discharged. Retrenchment is discharge of surplus workmen while the establishment continues. If bona fide closure of the entire business is involved, the termination is NOT retrenchment (Hariprasad case) but workers are entitled to compensation under Section 25FFF (now IRC 2020).

🟣 Deepali Gundu Surwase v. Kranti Junior Adhyapak | (2013) 10 SCC 324 | Supreme Court

Facts: A teacher claimed reinstatement with back wages after being dismissed from service. The employer was an educational institution.

Held: The Supreme Court laid down the principles governing reinstatement and back wages in labour law: (a) once a dismissal/retrenchment is found wrongful, reinstatement is the primary remedy; (b) back wages for the entire period of wrongful exclusion from service should ordinarily be awarded; (c) the court has discretion to reduce back wages based on supervening circumstances; (d) the employee’s conduct during the period of absence (whether they sought alternative employment) is relevant.

Principle: Reinstatement is the primary remedy for wrongful termination; full back wages should ordinarily be awarded unless there are reasons for deduction; the employee’s conduct during the period of absence is relevant to the quantum of back wages.

PART B: The Occupational Safety, Health and Working Conditions Code, 2020

Overview of the OSH Code 2020

🔵 OSH Code 2020 — Overview

The Occupational Safety, Health and Working Conditions Code 2020 consolidates 13 earlier central labour laws relating to factory safety, mines, docks, plantations, contract labour, inter-state migrant workers, and others into a single unified code. It covers:

  • Factories Act 1948
  • Mines Act 1952
  • Dock Workers (Safety, Health and Welfare) Act 1986
  • Plantation Labour Act 1951
  • Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act 1970
  • Inter-State Migrant Workmen Act 1979
  • And 7 others

Applicability: Establishments employing 10+ workers (with power) or 20+ workers (without power).

Duties of Employer and Employees — Chapter III OSH Code 2020

🔵 Duties of the Employer (Chapter III)
  • Provide and maintain a work environment that is safe, without risks to health and adequate as regards welfare
  • Provide and maintain a safe means of access to, and egress from, every part of the workplace
  • Provide information, instruction, training, and supervision necessary to ensure health and safety
  • Take measures to mitigate and control hazardous substances
  • Ensure safe use, handling, storage, and transport of articles and substances
  • Carry out risk assessments and medical examinations of workers
  • Appoint safety officers and health officers as prescribed
  • Constitute safety committees in establishments with 500+ workers
  • Report occupational diseases and accidents to the authority
🔵 Duties of the Employee
  • Take care of their own health and safety and that of persons who may be affected by their acts
  • Comply with the employer’s health and safety instructions
  • Use PPE (Personal Protective Equipment) provided by the employer
  • Report any dangerous situation, defects, or accidents to the employer
  • NOT interfere with or misuse safety equipment
  • Cooperate with the employer in implementing safety measures

Occupational Safety, Health and Welfare Provisions

🔵 Chapter IV — Occupational Safety and Health Standards
  • Cleanliness and proper waste disposal
  • Adequate ventilation, lighting, and temperature control
  • Control of dust, fumes, and hazardous substances
  • Prevention of overcrowding (minimum 14.2 cubic metres per worker)
  • Safe machinery — fencing, inspection, testing
  • Protection from fire — firefighting equipment, emergency exits, evacuation procedures
  • Hazardous work: special provisions for work involving chemicals, radiation, noise
  • Annual health surveillance for workers in hazardous processes
🔵 Chapter VI — Welfare Provisions
  • Washing facilities, canteen (100+ workers), rest rooms and lunch rooms
  • First aid boxes — one per 150 workers; ambulance room (500+ workers)
  • Safety Officer (500+ workers); Welfare Officer (250+ workers in factories)
  • Crèche (30+ women workers)
  • Protection for women — prohibition on night work except with safeguards; provision for transport

Hours of Work and Annual Leave with Wages — Chapter VII

ProvisionOSH Code 2020
Maximum daily work hours8 hours per day (12 for certain establishments with overtime premium)
Maximum weekly hours48 hours per week
Spread-overNo worker to work more than 10.5 hours in a day (including rest interval)
Rest intervalAt least 30 minutes after 5 hours of continuous work
OvertimePremium wages at twice the ordinary rate of wages
Annual leave1 day for every 20 days worked (adult worker); 1 day per 15 days (child worker)
Accumulation of leaveMaximum 30 days (can be accumulated up to 30 days at end of year)
Leave encashmentUnavailed leave can be encashed at the end of service

📚 Key Cases Summary

CaseYearPrinciple
Rangaswami v. Registrar of Trade Unions1962Government employees can form trade unions; IDA “industry” definition relevant to TUA
FCI Staff Union v. FCI1995No fundamental right to recognition for collective bargaining under Art. 19(1)(c)
Bangalore Water Supply v. A. Rajappa1978Widest interpretation of “industry” — triple test
State of UP v. Jai Bir Singh2005Sovereign functions are NOT industry — limits Bangalore Water Supply
Workmen of Dimakuchi Tea Estate v. Management1958Individual dispute becomes industrial dispute only when espoused by union/body of workmen
J.H. Jadhav v. Forbes Gokak2005Section 2A IDA — individual workmen can raise dispute directly after termination
Dharangadhra Chemical Works v. State of Saurashtra1957Control test for determining employment relationship
A. Sundarambal v. Govt. of Goa1988Teachers are NOT workmen under IDA 1947
H.R. Adyanthaya v. Sandoz (India)1994Predominant nature of duty test for determining workman status
Syndicate Bank v. K. Umesh Nayak1994Legality (procedure) and justification (substance) of strike are distinct enquiries
Management of Chandramalai Estate v. Its Workmen1960Workers not entitled to wages during illegal strike
T.K. Rangarajan v. Govt. of Tamil Nadu2003Government servants have no fundamental right to strike
Punjab Land Dev. Corporation v. PO Labour Court1990Retrenchment has wide meaning — any termination (except excluded categories)
Deepali Gundu Surwase v. Kranti Junior Adhyapak2013Reinstatement is primary remedy; back wages ordinarily due for wrongful termination
R.S. Ruikar v. Emperor1935Criminal immunity has limits — illegal strikes not protected

📝 Important Questions for Exam

A. Short Answer (2–5 marks)

  1. What is a “Trade Union” under the IRC 2020? What are the requirements for its registration?
  2. What is a Negotiating Union/Negotiating Council under Section 14 IRC 2020?
  3. Explain the criminal immunity of trade unions under Section 15 IRC 2020.
  4. Explain the civil (tort) immunity of trade unions under Section 16 IRC 2020.
  5. Distinguish between a legal strike and an illegal strike.
  6. What are Standing Orders? Who must certify them and how?
  7. What is the LIFO principle in retrenchment law?
  8. Distinguish between retrenchment, lay-off, and closure.
  9. What is the prerequisite for valid retrenchment under Section 80 IRC 2020?
  10. What are the duties of the employer under the OSH Code 2020?
  11. What are the maximum hours of work under the OSH Code 2020?
  12. What did the Supreme Court decide in T.K. Rangarajan v. Government of Tamil Nadu regarding government servants’ right to strike?
  13. Distinguish between “contract of service” and “contract for services.”
  14. How does Kahn-Freund describe the role of law in labour relations?
  15. What is the Marxist critique of the employment contract?

B. Long Answer (10–15 marks)

  1. Discuss the law relating to trade union registration and recognition in India under the IRC 2020. How does the Negotiating Union provision (Section 14) improve upon the old law?
  2. Critically examine the criminal and civil immunities of trade unions under the IRC 2020. What are the limits of these immunities with reference to relevant case law?
  3. Write a detailed essay on the concept of “industry” under Indian labour law. Discuss the Bangalore Water Supply decision and its subsequent modification in State of UP v. Jai Bir Singh.
  4. When does an individual dispute become an industrial dispute? Discuss with reference to the Dimakuchi Tea Estate case and the significance of Section 2A IDA (now IRC 2020).
  5. Write a detailed note on the legality and justification of strikes under Indian law. Does an employee have a right to strike? Discuss T.K. Rangarajan and the ILO position.
  6. Discuss the law relating to retrenchment under the IRC 2020. What are the prerequisites? Explain the LIFO principle and the right of re-employment.
  7. Write a note on lay-off and closure under the IRC 2020. Distinguish between the two concepts and discuss the compensation available to workmen in each case.
  8. Discuss the key provisions of the OSH Code 2020 relating to employer duties, occupational safety, welfare provisions, and hours of work.
  9. Examine Kahn-Freund’s thesis that “law is a technique for regulating social power” in the context of Indian labour law. Do you agree that collective bargaining is the most effective mechanism for regulating the employment relationship?
  10. Critically analyse the Marxist critique of labour law. Is law capable of achieving genuine equality in the employment relationship?

C. Problem-Based Questions

  1. Problem: A registered trade union of garment workers calls a strike without giving 14 days’ notice to the employer. Is the strike legal? Can the employer dismiss the striking workers?
    Hint: IRC Section 62 — notice is mandatory. Strike without notice = illegal strike. Workers can be dismissed for illegal strike (Section 89 IRC — penalty). However, employer must still follow domestic enquiry before dismissal — no summary dismissal without procedure.
  2. Problem: An employer decides to retrench 50 workers out of 400 workers. He pays them retrenchment compensation but does not give advance notice. Is the retrenchment valid? Does he need government permission?
    Hint: Section 80 IRC 2020 — notice (1 month) OR wages in lieu are mandatory prerequisites; 400 workers = above 300 threshold → Section 81 prior permission required. No prior permission = retrenchment illegal.
  3. Problem: A freelance IT consultant works at a company’s office for 2 years, uses company equipment, follows company timings, and works only for this company. He claims he is an “employee” entitled to retrenchment compensation. Advise.
    Hint: Control test + integration test. If employer controls HOW he works (not just the result), he is an employee. Use Dharangadhra test. On facts — working at office, company equipment, exclusive — looks like employment not contract for services. Likely entitled to retrenchment compensation.
  4. Problem: 3 workmen from a factory of 50 workers approach a union which takes up their cause. They allege arbitrary retrenchment without notice. The employer argues there is no “industrial dispute” since they are just 3 individuals. Advise.
    Hint: Post-Section 2A IDA (now IRC) — individual dispute by retrenched workman is deemed industrial dispute. Even without espousement, retrenched workmen can directly raise dispute. Union support makes it even clearer. Employer’s argument fails.

D. MCQ Practice (20 Questions)

  1. The IRC 2020 consolidates: (a) 2 laws (b) 3 laws (c) 4 laws (d) 5 laws. Answer: (b)
  2. Under Section 14 IRC 2020, a Sole Negotiating Union is recognised when a union has: (a) 25% membership (b) 33% membership (c) 51% membership (d) 75% membership. Answer: (c)
  3. “Law is a technique for the regulation of social power” was said by: (a) Karl Marx (b) Kahn-Freund (c) Roscoe Pound (d) Austin. Answer: (b)
  4. Criminal immunity for trade unions is provided under: (a) Section 14 IRC (b) Section 15 IRC (c) Section 16 IRC (d) Section 17 IRC. Answer: (b)
  5. Civil immunity for trade unions means immunity from: (a) Criminal prosecution (b) Tort liability for inducing breach of contract (c) Government regulation (d) Collective bargaining obligations. Answer: (b)
  6. In Bangalore Water Supply v. A. Rajappa, the Supreme Court gave: (a) Narrow definition of industry (b) Widest possible definition of industry (c) Applied three-part test distinguishing private and public sector (d) Excluded government from industry definition. Answer: (b)
  7. Sovereign functions of the State are NOT “industry” — this was held in: (a) Bangalore Water Supply case (b) Dimakuchi Tea Estate case (c) State of UP v. Jai Bir Singh (d) Rangaswami case. Answer: (c)
  8. The LIFO principle applies to: (a) Lay-off (b) Retrenchment (c) Closure (d) Standing Orders. Answer: (b)
  9. T.K. Rangarajan case held that government servants: (a) Have a fundamental right to strike (b) Have a statutory right to strike (c) Have no fundamental right to strike (d) Can strike but only for wage disputes. Answer: (c)
  10. A strike is “illegal” if it: (a) Demands wage revision (b) Is during pendency of conciliation/tribunal proceedings (c) Is without foreign funding (d) Is not supported by ILO. Answer: (b)
  11. Under Section 80 IRC 2020, retrenchment compensation is: (a) 7 days’ wages per year of service (b) 15 days’ average wages per completed year of service (c) One month’s wages per year (d) 30 days’ wages per year. Answer: (b)
  12. Prior permission of government for retrenchment is required for establishments with: (a) 50+ workers (b) 100+ workers (c) 200+ workers (d) 300+ workers (IRC 2020). Answer: (d)
  13. Lay-off compensation is: (a) 25% of basic wages (b) 50% of basic wages + DA (c) Full wages (d) 75% of basic wages. Answer: (b)
  14. Teachers are NOT workmen — this was held in: (a) Dimakuchi Tea Estate case (b) A. Sundarambal v. Govt. of Goa (c) H.R. Adyanthaya case (d) FCI Staff Union case. Answer: (b)
  15. The test for determining employment vs. independent contract that examines HOW work is done is called: (a) Integration test (b) Control test (c) LIFO test (d) Predominant nature test. Answer: (b)
  16. The OSH Code 2020 consolidates how many earlier central labour laws? (a) 7 (b) 10 (c) 13 (d) 16. Answer: (c)
  17. Under OSH Code 2020, the maximum weekly working hours are: (a) 40 hours (b) 44 hours (c) 48 hours (d) 60 hours. Answer: (c)
  18. The Syndicate Bank case established the distinction between: (a) Lay-off and retrenchment (b) Legal and individual dispute (c) Legality and justification of strike (d) Employer and independent contractor. Answer: (c)
  19. In Deepali Gundu Surwase case (2013), the Supreme Court held that the primary remedy for wrongful termination is: (a) Compensation in lieu of reinstatement (b) Reinstatement with back wages (c) Criminal prosecution of employer (d) Reference to National Tribunal. Answer: (b)
  20. The Trade Union Political Fund under Section 17 IRC 2020: (a) Can be used for any union purpose (b) Must be kept separate and members cannot be penalised for not contributing (c) Is mandatory for all registered unions (d) Can be combined with the general fund. Answer: (b)

⚡ Quick Revision Summary

1. Key Definitions — IRC 2020

TermSection IRC 2020One-Line Definition
Trade Union2(zl)Combination (temp/permanent) for regulating employer-workman relations
Trade Union Dispute2(zm)Dispute connected with employment/conditions of labour or trade union activity
Negotiating Union2(z), 14Union with 51%+ members = Sole Negotiating Union; below 51% → Negotiating Council
Strike2(zk)Concerted cessation of work by body of workers
Lock-out2(u)Employer’s temporary closure of workplace or refusal to employ
Lay-off2(h)Employer’s temporary inability to give employment due to specified reasons
Retrenchment2(t)Termination of workman’s service for any reason other than disciplinary action
Closure2(zh)Permanent closing down of place of employment
Industry2(p)Systematic activity for production/supply of goods/services to satisfy human wants
Workman/Employee2(zr)/2(l)Person doing manual/skilled/technical/clerical/supervisory work (not managerial)

2. Comparison: Lay-Off vs. Retrenchment vs. Closure

FeatureLay-OffRetrenchmentClosure
NatureTemporary cessation of workPermanent termination of servicePermanent closing of establishment
Employer-employee tieContinuesEndsEnds
ReasonShortage of power/materials, machinery breakdown, etc.Any reason (surplus, restructuring, etc.)Permanent closure of business
Compensation50% basic wages + DA for lay-off period15 days’ wages per year of service15 days’ wages per year of service
Notice requirementNone (but muster roll maintained)1 month’s notice or wages in lieu60 days’ notice to government
Prior permission (300+ workers)Yes (Section 79)Yes (Section 81)Yes (Section 82)

3. Golden Rules

  • Kahn-Freund: Law is a technique for regulating social power. In labour law — power is unequal; law intervenes to protect workers through collective bargaining (auxiliary law), restrictions on collective action (restrictive), and direct standards (protective law).
  • Trade Union Registration: 7+ members may apply; IRC 2020 requires 10%/100 workers (whichever less) as members.
  • Negotiating Union: 51%+ membership = Sole Negotiating Union; below 51% → Negotiating Council from unions with 20%+ membership.
  • Criminal Immunity (Section 15): Only for registered unions, only for acts in furtherance of trade dispute, does NOT cover illegal strikes or violence.
  • Strike: 14 days’ notice mandatory; prohibited during pendency of proceedings; LIFO for retrenchment selection.
  • Right to Strike: No fundamental right for government servants (T.K. Rangarajan). ILO recognises it as fundamental but India’s courts have not.
  • Retrenchment prerequisites: 1 month notice + 15 days’ wages per year + notice to government. 300+ workers: prior permission needed.
  • Industry: Triple test (systematic, employer-employee cooperation, goods/services for human wants). Sovereign functions excluded (Jai Bir Singh).
  • Individual dispute = Industrial Dispute after Section 2A IDA/IRC — no need for union espousement for terminated workmen.

4. Memory Aids

🟡 Trade Union Immunities: “CC-F” — Criminal + Civil + Funds

Section 15 = Criminal | Section 16 = Civil (Tort) | Section 17 = Funds (General + Political)

🟡 Retrenchment Prerequisites: “NCN” — Notice + Compensation + Notice to Government

1 Month Notice (or wages in lieu) + 15 Days Compensation per year + Notice to Government + (for 300+ workers: Prior Permission)

🟡 Industry Triple Test: “SAP” — Systematic + Association (employer-employee) + Production

Systematic activity + employer-employee cooperation + production/supply of goods/services for human wants


↑ Back to Top